My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0508_Packet_a
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0508_Packet_a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:35:36 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting— 04/24/06 <br />��AFT Minutes - Page 15 <br />Mayor Klausing attempted to clarify the process. <br />Councilmember Kough expressed his concern that his items be <br />considered for discussion and action at tonight's meeting; <br />specifically Item 6.c entitled, "Request of Councilmember <br />Kough for a Motion to Instruct Staff to Apply for State and <br />Federal Funds for a One-Half Mile Pathway on Fairv�ew Avenue <br />from County Road B to Ros��awn Avenue." <br />Mayor Klausing clarified that with Council majority consensus, <br />any item could be added for discussion on a specific agenda, as <br />per the adopted resolution for processing requests. <br />Klausing moved, Ihlan seconded, to consider Item 6.a entitled, <br />"Request of Councilmember Kough for a Motion to Add <br />Assistant City Manager to the Title of Community Development <br />Director" for discussion at tonight's meeting. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Kough; Ma�chka; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought to move consideration to set a <br />public hearing for possible imposition of a liquor penalty as <br />previously discussed. <br />Mayor Klausing indicated that City Attorney Anderson had <br />advised that deleting the discussion from tonight's agenda was <br />not a function of not wanting it on the agenda, but notice by the <br />City Attorney that they were still in-process with their legal <br />opinion. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned the performance of the City <br />Attorney and whether or not that needed Council review at this <br />time; noting her original request that discussion be included at <br />the April 10,2006 meeting. <br />Mayor Klausing, as Chair, determined that both the liquor <br />violation, as well as the Ethics Resolution discussion, would be <br />heard at the May 8, 2006 meeting unless Councilmembers were <br />8,2006 City <br />Council Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.