2006_0522_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: OS/22/06 ITEM NO. 3.i Department Approval: ['i �k� ��i:��, ��•, ,� ��: ��,�-�1 � Agenda Section TRP �� CONSENT I�ein Descxiptio�. Proposed City Code Revision pertaining to Restaurants within tl B-4, Retail Office Service District (PF37G4). 1_Q BACKGROUND: [.] In February 2004, the City Council approved amendments to Section 1005 (Business Districts) of the Roseville City Code. Specifically, the Council supported a number of text amendments for updating and clarifying the requirements within Busine�s District zoning classifications. ].� The revised section included the provision of a chart (replaced text within each district) that lists all uses and where they are permitted or permitted as a conditional use. Over the past years, staff has encountered a couple of "codification"errors — where requirements addressed in the code have been mistal{enly omitted from the chart. I..} Section 1005.06 speal{s to the purpose of the Retail Office Service District, stating. The B-4, Retail office Se�viee District zs designed to provide a limited mi� of land uses, made compatible through controls of high quality star�darcls, to facilitate more intensive, larger, and higher value development and redevelopment areas for the regional market. This dist�ict allows opportunities to antegrate high quality ��i��. hotels, restaurants, retail uses and selected o�ce and manufacturinguses visible f�om state or county roads. The B-4 Retail �, f�'ice SeYVice District in intended for certain areas designated as B, Business within the ComprehensivePlan. I.�4 A recent review of the Code by the City Planner — specifically the chart — concluded that all types of restaurantshave been omitted form the B-4 zone, which means that they are prohibited. A review of the previous Code allowance concludes thai restaurants under 5,000 sq. f�. were permitted within il�is district. ].� In February 2003, the City Council approved a text amendments aimed at clarifying types of restaurants and the zones within which they are permitted and conditional. This amendment specifically established a class system of restaurants and assigned them within the various business classifications— B-4 having Class I Traditional, Class � Traditional w/no�- intoxication, Class T� Traditional wlintoxication all per�nii��d; Class V Drive-In as a Ci7P; and Class II Fast Food Convenience and Class VI Tal{e-out & Delivery prohibited. l.� The Citv Planner has reviewed the text situation with the Citv Attomev where it was concluded that staff should proceed with a request for L��7� iL suppart to modify (include) specific restaurants a pe�itted/condztianal within the business District chart.