Laserfiche WebLink
'�, � 1Vlember Boerigter spoke to the condition pertaining to the RV, specifically, that it not be <br />removed during construction and then removed after — if code requires that such vehicles <br />be located on a hard surface, why are we not requiring it in this case. City Planner stated <br />because this is an INTERIM USE PERMIT the proposal does need to meet the City Code <br />or ComprehensivePlan. However, as a temporary use this situation did not present the <br />l�inds of issues/concerns as the more permanent and seasonal �Vs do to the City Staff. <br />�,� Member Boerigter asked whether the Planner envisioned the conditions dictate that the <br />RV park in that location (the one identified on map (YES). Boerigter also wondered how <br />to handle condition "C" regarding the proposed 200 gallon tank. The City Planner <br />indicated to add in the option for the tank, but allow him to discuss with the Building <br />Official and others prior to full support. Boerigter asked about the storage unit and <br />whether it is common to have them on site for 6 months or longer. The Planner stated the <br />staff is familiar with all types of storage units and s�art/�ang term storage. He added that <br />staff was not concerned about the location or duration — these units are throughout the <br />city during construction, such as constructiontrailers. <br />'�,1 C� Member Roe asked about parking of the personal vehicles. Alexander indicated he would <br />park on driveway or east side of drive on the grass — expressed concerned with RV <br />location and location of vehicle parking. Member Boerigter also expressed concern over <br />the possible precedent this request was setting (NO). City Planner added that the <br />Community Development staff considers this a construction site and as such it acts much <br />differently than an improved property. <br />7.l l Member poherty asked whether the new home would he in the same location as old <br />_ home. Alexander indicated that the house and foundationwill be completelyremoved. <br />?. L? The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the request by Jim <br />Alexander for an INTERIM USE PERMIT at 920 Parker Avenue, to establish a <br />temporary living quarters (recreational camper), based on the comments of Section 5 and <br />the conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated May 3,2006. <br />�,�] SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: <br />�C. ] ADOPT a RESOLUTION APPROVING an INTERIM USE PERMIT for Jim <br />Alexander, 920 Parker Avenue, establishing a temporary living quarters (recreational <br />camper), based on the comments of Section 5 and the conditions of Section 6 of the <br />project report dated May 22,2006. <br />Preparedby: Thomas Pasc�e (651-792-7074) <br />AttachmeYts: Narrative, property location map, and aerial photo of parcel. <br />?F'_ ��_?1.�� �-�'_'�C�1.�3c Y- Page 5 of 5 <br />