My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0522_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0522_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 4:15:27 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — OS/15/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 7 <br />3) The City can commit to the necessary funding <br />mechanisms to replace City assets at the end of their <br />useful lives; <br />4) The City can commit to a competitive compensation <br />and benefit package to attract and retain quality <br />employees; <br />5) Cash reserve and other budget-related policies will <br />be reviewed and adopted; and <br />6) The budgeting process and budget-related <br />information needs will be identified prior to <br />formulating budgets. <br />Staff identified the following objectives or action steps, <br />some already compiled and distributed to the City Council <br />as part of the initia12007 budgeting process; and some in <br />process and available for distribution in the near future, <br />including: <br />1) Identification of budget-related policies for <br />consideration and discussion; <br />2) Identification of the preferred budget review <br />process and all budget-related information needs; <br />3� Preparation of a 10-year projection of all known <br />or expected budgeting impacts; and <br />4� Alignment of budget decisions with long-term <br />goals. <br />Mr. Miller noted that policy discussions may include cash <br />reserves, asset replacement, debt issuance, spending <br />trends, comparative data, and funding levels for programs <br />and service levels. <br />Discussion among Councilmembers and staff included the <br />reserve study currently underway by Springsted, and <br />anticipated for presentation to the City Council at the May <br />22, 2006 meeting; impacts of the elected Council body and <br />differing priorities and the need for community-wide <br />education and support related to long-term planning and <br />spending; sustaining a steady budget process, rather than <br />one of spikes; the need for the Council and staff to be as <br />open� and transparent as possible in the budget process; and <br />impacts of unfunded mandates and other jurisdictions (i.c�., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.