My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0620_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0620_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:51:49 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 06/12/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 5 <br />Commission and the City Council; and how to approach <br />new residents, or anticipated residents, to provide input into <br />the visioning process; and discussion and idea-sharing with <br />other communities and their Planning Commissions. <br />Planning Commissioner poherty noted the need for the <br />City Council to approach other communities for their <br />feedback regarding planning issues, given the hesitancy of <br />Planning Commissioners to get involved with other <br />communities outside their charge from their respective City <br />Councils. <br />Mayor Klausing suggested that the Planning Commission <br />use staff as a source of information exchange with other <br />communities. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed concern that, if one <br />Commissioner representative attended the Council meeting, <br />they may not express the view of the full body, but their <br />personal view, if it happened to be in opposition to the <br />maj ority vote and recommendation. <br />Councilmember Ihlan suggested that the Commission <br />consider additional communication with the community <br />prior to a Public Hearing on a large project to allow for <br />more input. Councilmember Ihlan suggested a <br />development newsletter or more use of the web�ite to alert <br />the public. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke noted that the City didn't <br />have a project until staff received an application; and <br />advised that staff tried to encourage as much <br />communication as feasible, by the developer and staff, once <br />a solid project was applied for. Mr. Paschke noted <br />developer involvement with neighborhoods through <br />informational meetings; and further noted that July would <br />be staffs first attempt to get a draft agenda on the websitie <br />for upcoming projects. <br />Commissioner Mary Bateman reviewed various <br />communications methods in place, including community <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.