2006_0620_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

�.� Parlcing is proposed along the west, east and south sides of the structure, with the proposed storm water management occurring within certain curb islands (infiltration) and within a larger infiltration basin in the front yard. �.� The City Code does not include an on-site parlcing ratio for fitness centers. However, the City Planner has reviewed the Code and determined that a ratio similar to an auditorium or public assembly space (4.1 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area) is a rational fit, but that the ratio should be increased from 4.1 to 4.5 per 1,000 sq. ft. Utilizing a 4.5/�,000 sq. ft. would create a requirement of 2S8 on-site parlcing spaces for the 55,000 sq. ft facility. The submitted plan indicated 342 on-site parking spaces. $, � The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on May 25 to complete its revievv/comment of the submitted proposal and had no substantial comments or concerns. The DRC supported the reviewed structure placement and design, as well as those site changes. The DRC also concluded that the proposal met the purpose and intent of Section 1005 (Business Districts) and 10i0 (Design Standards of the City Code and supported its approval through the REZONING and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT processes. �, � Before any building permit can be issued by the City, the proposed proj ect (since it is over one acre) will require a storm sewer management surface water permit from the Rice Creek Watershed. The proposal must also meet the City's storm water management requirements and receive the approval of the City Engineer as well as an erosion control permit. A utility plan must be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department and Fire Marshal that indicates the location of the properly sized sanitary sewer and water stubs, and appropriate fire hydrant locations. �.? Sigzzage for the site and building will be required to meet Section 1009 of the Roseville City Code (proposed signage as indicated on elevation drawings meets this requirement) and parlcing lot lighting (new downcast) will be required to meet Section 1010 of the City Code. R. B A landscape plan will be required that meets the Street Tree Master Plan for boulevard trees along the service drive (those that will not blocic views of turning vehicles) and includes internal landscaping consistentwith Section 1010. $.� No EAW is required for the change in use. �,� STAFF RECOMMENDATION. {�_ 1 Based on the findings of Section 6 of this proj ect report dated June 7,2006, the City Planner recommends approval of the REZONING from an existing I-1, Light Industrial District to B-2, Retail Business District. PP3758_RCA 062t►06.dac Page 5 of 7