My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0620_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0620_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:51:49 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�.0 REVIEW of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: <br />�. ] Section 1013.01 requires the City to consider the following criteria when reviewing a <br />Conditional Use Permit: <br />a. Impact on traffic <br />b. Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities <br />e. Compatibility of the site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure with <br />contiguous properties <br />d. Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties <br />e. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare <br />f. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan <br />7_� Permitted Uses. The CityPlanner has reviewedthe redevelopmentproposal from a truck <br />terminal to a fitness center and concluded the proposal meets these criteria. Specifically, <br />the newly constructed structure and site improvements are permitted in a B-2 District by <br />issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. <br />?.� Traffic. Analysis provided by the applicant concludes that the site would generate an <br />AM peak hour volume of 29� trips (165 entering and 125 existing) and a PM peak hour <br />volume of 295 trips (180 entering and 115 existing). Cleveland Avenue in this general <br />location had a 2001 Average Daily Traffic of 4,000. The 2020 Average Daily Traffic <br />projection is 8,450, whichprojection has accounted for the redevelopmentof the Mastel <br />site. <br />'�,� Compatibility.The proposed use is compatible with the existing and surrounding uses <br />and with proper exterior building treatment, drainage, and site improvements such as <br />storm water management and landscaping, the buildirzglsite will not have an adverse <br />impact on surrounding properiy or values. <br />'�, ti Health Safety. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public <br />welfare. <br />?,� ComprehensivePlan. The change in use of the site from a non-conformingtruck <br />terminal to a fitness center is a compatible use with the ComprehensivePlan designation <br />of Business. <br />�,� REVIEW of DEVELOPMENT PLAN: <br />#S_ ] As submittedthe proposed redevelopment would include a 55,000 sq. ft. fitness center <br />and associated site improvements. The proposed structurewould have a comer entry <br />situated between the sauth and west facing building walls —which provides a presence <br />along Cleveland Avenue and the adjacent interstate. <br />�,'� The structure and parking lot meet all required setbacks as required by Section 1005.01 of <br />the Roseville City Code. <br />PF37S8_RCA 462006.dac Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.