Laserfiche WebLink
If the Contractor or the City is not able to find a market within 30 days, the City has the <br />option to: <br />a� Require the Contractor to continue to collect the particular recyclable. In such <br />case, the City would pay the Contractor, as additional compensation, the tipping fee <br />at the Newport RDF plant or a mutually agreeable alternative site. The Contractor <br />is required to keep accurate records of said fees and provide the City receipts of <br />payment. <br />b� No�i�'y the Contractor to cease collection of the particular recyclable until a feasible <br />market is located, either by the Contractoror by the City. The Contractorwould <br />then be responsible for the cost of printing and distributing educational materials <br />explaining the market situation to residents. <br />In its notification letter of June 1(attached), Eureka states it will continue collecting green glass and <br />looking for alternative markets to recycle glass at its highest and best use. It is proposing that if the <br />temporary market stops accepting green and mixed glass, Eureka will ship the glass to Raguse <br />Manufacturingin Wheata�, Minnesotafor use as a sand blasting medium. While not considered <br />recycling, the state classifies using glass in this manner to be a beneficial reuse and it is not subject to <br />sanction. It would cost Eureka an additional $23 a ton to ship the glass to Wheatot� which would decrease <br />the City's revenue share by approximately $7,000 a year. <br />The City has three options: <br />1) Have Eureka continue to collect green glass, but the City pays for its disposal at the Newpart <br />RDF plant or other mutually agreeable alternative site. <br />2) Have Eureka discontinue collecting green glass. Eureka would then communicate to residents <br />about why it would no longer collect green glass. The City and Eureka would renegotiate the <br />�,er h�usehold fee paid for recycling collection. <br />;1 }� �rr� to allow Eureka to ship the glass to Ra�a��� ��la��a fa��tun�ig in Wheaion, Minnesota for <br />use as a sand blasting medium. ��� ��,:,,�� ���,� � <br />To preserve its long term viability to collect and process glass, Eureka Recycling will be asking Ramsey <br />County for a loan from the County's Recycling Market Development Fund. The loan would be used in <br />combinationwith a loan from the State to purchase optical sorting equipment. The equipment would <br />allow Eureka to more effectively separate glass by color and remove contaminants. This improves the <br />quality of the glass cullet and increases the ability to sell the glass to a manufacturer that can recycle it at <br />its highest and best use. Eureka is asl�ing for its client cities in Ramsey County to send a joint letter to the <br />County asl�ing for the initiation of loan negotiations between Eureka and the County (a copy of the <br />proposed letter is attached). <br />Council Action Rec�uested <br />Select which of the three options listed above the City should pursue in the event of the dissolution of <br />current markets for green glass. <br />Support the initiation of negotiations between Eureka and Ramsey County on a loan to purchase optical <br />sorting equipment. <br />Attachments: Eureka's letter to Roseville of June 1, 2006 <br />Proposed joint letter to Ramsey County <br />