My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0620_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0620_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:51:49 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City CouncilRegularMeeting— 06/12/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 2 <br />issues for completion of both pieces; possible re-formatting <br />of goals and policies of both processes; and significant <br />issues. Mr. Traynor noted the Planning Commission's <br />preference to utilize other City advisory commissions to <br />discuss various updates relative to their specific areas of <br />expertise; and provided as a Bench Handout the Planning <br />Commission's proposed work plan, various components <br />and timelines, as well as linkages to the visioning process <br />and public input; with 2008 as the completion date as <br />required by law for the updated Comprehensive Plan. <br />City Manager Beets noted that the timeline, after technical <br />updates and the community visioning process, along with <br />public hearings, all of which were anticipated for <br />completion by late falllearly winter of 2007, a draft would <br />then be presented to the Planning Commission by <br />September of 2007, for their review and final <br />recommendations to the City Council for their review and <br />analysis, and final approval; with it anticipated to be <br />provided to the Metropolitan Council by March of 2008 for <br />their six-month review process. <br />Chair Traynor concurred with City Manager Beets, that the <br />work needed to proceed promptly and couldn't wait until <br />2007 to facilitate the tight timeline. <br />Chair Traynor expressed appreciation for Planning <br />Commissioner Roe's input on the environmental portion of <br />the Comprehensive Plan; and the Commission's desire to <br />�ully utilize communication links between various steering <br />committees involved in the visioning process. <br />Councilmember Kough expressed concern that an <br />additional eastbound lane on Highway 3 6 was not a priority <br />with the State. <br />Further discussion included possible amendments to the <br />Comprehensive Plan needed in 2009 or 2010 to incorporate <br />final findings and goals from the visioning process; <br />ongoing traffic congestion of eastbound Highway 36 and <br />getting a higher priority recognized by various agencies for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.