My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0828_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0828_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:57:51 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:38:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Final Comments <br />At an earlier Council meeting, the Council asked to get a comparison of the City Manager's <br />Recommended Budget to the budget requests made by the Department Heads. The following <br />table highlights the differences. <br />1�:,� <br />1F�+l�i.�r _ <br />P3rk� & F�x4a��li�n <br />S ] _SUa.��a� <br />� �Ja�J�aLrfLr <br />� �.,���.�1� <br />y� � .���.��ti� � r�•,�?. <br />� yJ�V��F��J�J YL`kt� i V <br />Y� �,Sa�_�] [� �,���� <br />The Council should be aware that some of the reductions made in the City Manager's <br />Recommended Budget were the result of new cost savings that were identified diter the budget <br />requests had been submitted. Examples include lower dispatch costs, copier rental costs, etc. <br />Reductions were also made to get the City's overa�i budget in Iine with Council's direction for an <br />inflationary-type increase. <br />If the budget reductions noted above are reinstated, the overall budget percentage increase for <br />Fire, Police, and Parks & Recreation will be 3.0%, 4.�%, and 4.7% respectively. <br />3— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.