Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Study Session — 08/21/06 <br />DRAF'�` Minutes ' Page 4 <br />Mr. Miller advised that the City's we�site was one form of <br />technology used for information and e-commerce purposes; and <br />recognized the limitations of the website developed in the m�d- <br />1990's. Mr. Miller noted that since the original development, <br />individual pages had been modified on a departmental needs <br />basis, but site visitors encountered differing perspectives, loolcs <br />and functions within the wel�sz�e. <br />Mr. Miller advised that earlier in 2006, a webszte taslc force <br />consisting of employee representatives from each department <br />was created to evaluate the website, with their original worlc plan <br />identified as follows: <br />1) Identify the purpose of the website; <br />2) Identify the types of content that should be on the website; <br />3) Assess the strengths and weaknesses of current webs�te; <br />4) Identify the preferred attributes of a well-designed <br />website; <br />5) Identify other websz��s that emulate the preferred <br />attributes to be used as a model; <br />6) Establish an organizational structure and new design for <br />the City's new websit�; <br />7) Determine whether to host the website in-house or <br />outsource; <br />8) Determine whether to manage content in-house, or <br />outsource; and <br />9) Make a recommendation to the City Council. <br />Mr. Miller noted that there were no funds set aside in the 2006, <br />or proposed 2007 budgets, but that staff was seel�ing direction <br />from the City Council: <br />1) To malce no further investment at this time; <br />2) Commit additional monies to hire a professional web <br />design firm; <br />3) Commit additional monies to hire new City Staff to <br />redesign and maintain the site; or <br />4) Consider using an off-site websit� host. <br />Joel Koepp, City of Roseville ��� Technician, provided the <br />City's websi�e history; amount and static nature of content; <br />various design techniques; types of users and browsers; and <br />provided several samples of webs�tes from other communities <br />