My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0828_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0828_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:57:51 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:38:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 08/21/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 16 <br />Public Worlcs Director Duane Schwartz noted that staffs <br />last contact with the Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation (MnDOT) had been in July with them <br />questioning the status of the City's progress, and the City <br />responding to MnDOT that the City's Public Worlcs <br />department had submitted a request in the 2008 Capital <br />Improvement Program (CIP) with development of plans <br />for access proceeding. Mr. Schwartz advised that he <br />anticipated contact with MnDOT every few months to <br />determine the City's progress. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that the City was aware of the <br />options; however, the neighborhood was not in consensus <br />with one option; thus the Taslc Force of Councilmembers <br />Ihlan and Kou�;h to worlc with the neighborhood in <br />achieving neighborhood consensus for one proposal to <br />further develop. <br />A1 Sands, 2612 Ald��e <br />Mr. Sands opined that additional options were available, <br />specifically one developed by Mr. Craig Christianson; but <br />that staff needed Council direction to study that proposal <br />further. Mr. Sands further opined that options for only <br />�airview needed to be pursued at this time, rather than to <br />confuse the issue with Snelling and County Road C <br />options. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the options presented �o- <br />date; impacts to the neighborhood; cost-prohibitive nature <br />of all options; lacic of interest in neighborhood finding <br />consensus and a solution; engineering feasibility studies <br />of several options; residential and business impacts with <br />the "Christianson" �roposa]� possible funding from <br />MnDOT; and the length of time already spent in seelcing a <br />solution. <br />Councilmember Ihlan supported the PWET reviewing <br />options and making a recommendation. <br />Mr. Sands opined that the PWET didn't have the <br />expertise, and he was loolcing for engineering expertise of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.