Laserfiche WebLink
ll�.p�ri ir,�i l F'��pr�}��l � <br />� � � <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />���ar����,r .�p,�� o���d � <br />Item Description: Adopt the 2007 Preliminary Ta� Levy and Budget <br />Date: 9/11 /200� <br />Item No: g, <br />:��'�fkL�'3 t�i�ti�7�175: <br />Staf�` R=�rL� <br />Introduction <br />State Statute requires all cities in excess of 2,500 in population, to adopt a preliminary tax levy <br />and budget by September 1 S�� for the upcoming fiscal year. The preliminary levy is certified to <br />the County, whom in turn uses the information to prepare truth-in-taxation notices which are <br />mailed to individual property owners. Once the preliminary levy is adopted it can be lowered, <br />but not increased. The Final 2007 levy and budget are scheduled to be adopted in December. <br />In July of this year, Staff submitted a proposed budget for Council review, along with a separate <br />memo from the City Manager which outlined the proposed budget. An initial presentation on the <br />proposed budget was made on July 17,2006, followed by budget worksessions in August. <br />The 2007 Budget culminates several months' worth of work by City Staff researching and <br />evaluating all of the City's programs and services. To the greatest extent possible, new <br />technologies and efficiencies have been incorporated into our service delivery process. <br />However, several challenges remain that will have a significant impact on the 2007 Budget. <br />First, in 2006, the City relied on the use of $128,000 of reserves to plug the budget gap. As <br />we've stated on many occasions, the use of reserves is not sustainable. And we know from the <br />recent study performed by an outside consultant, our reserve levels in our key operating funds, <br />especially the General Fund, have dropped below both industry-recommended levels, as well as <br />our own Cash Reserve Policy. In addition, many of the City's largest service inputs - such as <br />£ue� and energy related costs are outpacing inflation at a substantial rate. Finally, based on <br />national and local measures, as well as collective bargaining contracts that have already been <br />settled, we are forecasting a need for a COLA of 3% or more. <br />2007 Budget Funding Sources <br />For the City's fee-based programs such as water, sewer, and some of our parks and recreation <br />programs, we project that an acceptable increase in user fees will be sufficient to offset the <br />higher costs of providing these services. Instead, our primary challenge is with the City's <br />property tax-supported programs. These programs include Police, Fire, Street Maintenance, Park <br />Maintenance, Legal, Elections, General Administration, and Finance. <br />As was noted above, the City Council has asked for a budget that can be funded with a 3.5% <br />increase in the property tax levy. The 2006 overall tax levy was $11,169,865. Therefore, a 3.5% <br />increase would equate to an additional $390,945 in available funding. <br />