2006_0911_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

My primary areas of concern with this project are: 1. Twin Ho�ne/Quad Homes, Bob Moser stated at the July 27,2006 neighborhood meeting, that the Twin and Quad units would be developed in partnership with the HRA. Price points for these units would be Z00-250�.. This contradicts staffs report that the T�win/Quad units will be marlceted toward "empty nesters" The Twin/Q�ad component of the redevelopment could be dropped, replacing the six units with three single family units at much higher price points. Loolc to the single family development at Oa.kcrest and Haml�zae, three of the SF homes sold for over well over $S�OK and one sold for $489IC. If Roseville pursues this higher level of density, within established low density neighborhoods, and contrary to its long range plan. How then, will the city deter someone from applying the same standards, given to the Mounds View site, to their property? The property I own at 2932 Hamline is about 43,SOOs�, just short of an acre. I could develop 6 Town Home units with price points of 350-400K. Would this be good for Roseville? If the Twin/�uad component must be retained, at the very least it should be shifted to the western edge of the site where it would abut two existing twin homes. 2. At the May 30,2006 neighborhood meeting, Bob Moser stated that the single family component of the development would meet all established setbacic requirements. This is not the case with the plat before you. Staffs report states that "the proposal contains lot sizes and uses that are no different than those within the surrounding community." Lot setbacics for this proposal have been reduced to accommodate the higher density. Front yard setbacics for the single family homes have been reduced from 30ft to 25�. The twin homes front yard setbacics have been reduced from 3Q� to 22�. This is of great concern for safety, at the intersection of Lydia and Haz�r��ine. Side yard setbacics for all units have been reduced from 1�} to Sft. These reduced setbacics are not at all "consistent" with the "surrounding area." 3. The water table in this area is quite high. The units or lots that are placed along I�a.��i�.e will very lilcely have to be "filled" thus raising the overall height of the structures. What will the finished "Pealc" elevation above the current established grade be? 4. With the redevelopment of the Ha�lxne Shopping center site, does Roseville need more senior housing (�win/quad homes) in this area? 5. This developments density C character, contradicts the report prepared in May o f 2005 by the HRA titled, "Community Dialo�ues on Housiz�g".