Laserfiche WebLink
Qualified Short List Screening Timeline Agreement <br />Pool Methodology by 14/17/06 <br />Firm Methodolo Cast Ex er. <br />Springsted — Review Rank based on Yes — <br />St. Paul Applicants to resumes Yes $5,000 National & <br />Criteria Metro <br />Waters- Review Do base references Not sure = Try $5,300 -� Yes — <br />Oldani - Applicants to and phone screen Expense National& <br />Texas Criteria Metro <br />Conduct phone <br />Start Farward Review interviews and Yes $2,700 NO — City <br />— St. Paul Applicants �o pravide summary of Manager <br />Criteria rational Exper. <br />Review Perforn� follow up Yes — and will also <br />Personnet Applicants to screening thraugh meet with Council to $1,500 - Yes — <br />Decisions Criteria & essays & present top candidates $3,OOQ National& <br />Internafiional score tY�em accompiislunent and short list Metro <br />(PDI) Mpls. documents recommendations <br />Based on the City's timeline, service needs, and financial efficiency, as well as the me�odologies and <br />experience oi each search firm, the stafirecommends awarding this contract to PDI. <br />CounciI Action Requested: <br />Motion to award the contract for search firm services in the City Manager hiring process to Personnel <br />Decisians Intez-national <br />