My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0925_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0925_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:22:04 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEPTEMBER 6,2006 DRAFT MINUTES <br />VARIANCE BOARD <br />Ix, � LANNING �'��.� 3655 <br />.Request by Todd Iliff for a VARIANCE to Roseville City Code, �100�l.01G (Residential <br />tlimensional Requirements) to a11ow a principal st�uctuie encroachment into the required <br />�Front yard setback adjacent to Da1e Cou��. <br />Chair I3akcrnan opened the Public Hearing for Planning Fi1e 3655. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request of Charles We�eczki, owner of a vacant <br />5arcel at Da1e Court and Da1e Street, currently zoned R-1, Single-Family residential, and the <br />Comprehensive P1an identified u� the Comprehensive P1an as Low Density Residential. Mr. <br />Paschke noted that the vacant 1ot was split off from a larger parcel in August of 2005, which <br />minor subdivision discussed the rationale for supporting the land division without any further <br />variances; Planning Commission and City Council both supported the proposed triangular <br />Minor Subdivision. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that, since the creation of the parcel, the applicant had been <br />unsuccessful in selling it due to the inability of six (� potential buyers to design a home and <br />attached garage in a manner achieving required setbacks. Upon review of the 1ot and its <br />buildable area, the applicant concludes that the allowance of an encroachment into the front <br />yard for an attached garage or living area would afford a buyer greater design flexibility on the <br />uniquely shaped parcel. <br />Staff recommended approval of the request, by resolution, due to unique and extenuating <br />circumstances, to a11ow a future horne�attached garage encroachment of up to fifteen feet <br />(15� into the required front yard setback for the vacant parcel at Da1e Court and Da1e Street <br />based on the comments and findings of Section 5 and the conditions of Section 6 of the <br />project report dated September 6, 2006. <br />Applicant's Representative: Todd Iliff, son-in-law of property owners, Charles and <br />Suzanne Welecski <br />Mr. Iliff noted his relationship to the applicant, and his role in assisting them with the <br />variance request and process. Mr. Iliff reviewed his narrative description of the property <br />dated Ju1y 13, 2006, attached to the staff report dated September 6, 2006. In the narrative, <br />Mr. Iliff reviewed the practical difficulties of the 1ot i�i accor�aoda�g typical and/or <br />standard hozne design plans; reviewed a schematic of a possible footprint for a single-family <br />home for the new 1ot; and the design's consistency with neighboring properties and sight <br />lines. <br />Discussion setbacks of adjoiz�i��� properties at thirty feet (30'} from the property lines; <br />easement and utility locations; and staffs interpretation of the variance allowing for the <br />encroachment of the principal structure or garage to provide more flexibility and to make the <br />design more functional and aesthetically pleasing and so the garage didn't become a sole <br />design feature with greater visibility than the main structure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.