My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0925_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0925_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:22:04 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appeal Letter to the City of Roseville <br />September 15,2006 <br />Page 5 <br />Moreover, the Applicants could have tried to play games with the subdivision of <br />the lot area prior to the Minor Subdivision. They did not do so. They could have cut out <br />an odd shaped pie piece or an elongated 1 foot strip along the curb or driveway on the <br />1822 Dale Court parcel, to achieve the additional the 892 square feet needed for the <br />"corner lot" requirement (frankly, it was also arguable whether the 1828 Dale Court <br />parcel was indeed a"corner lot" due to its unique location). <br />Instead, based on the Applicants' discussions with the City Planner and City Staff <br />this was not done. The Applicants played it straight and by the book. The lot split was <br />straight forward and made common sense. City Staff asicect the Applicants to submit a <br />drawing showing that a house could be built on the lot and the Applicants did by <br />submitting a house plan footprint that would indeed have required a variance. (see the <br />attached schematic drawing originally submitted with the Minor Subdivision Application <br />in 2005). In fact the house plan submitted to City Staff at the �iine of the request for the <br />Minor Subdivision included a plan essentialiy the same as is now being requested. <br />APPLICANTS REQUEST VS. CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />City Staff has recommended the approval of a fifteen (15') foot variance for the <br />entire �ron� side of the lot facing Dale Court. The Variance Board had some concerns <br />with the broad and open ended nature of this recommendation, which lil{ely led in part to <br />a denial of the Applicants' request. <br />City Staffs recommendation in many ways provides for a broader and a more <br />wide ranging (albeit a more flexible one) variance than the original request by the <br />Applicants. The original request by the Applicants is for up to a fifteen (15') foot setbacic <br />variance at a single point along Dale Court at the Northwest corner of the proposed <br />garage. The variance would diminish in length and amount until there was no variance <br />required at the Southwest corner of the proposed garage. In addition, the Applicants <br />requested a five foot variance along the entirety of the rear (East side) of the proposed <br />structure along Dale Street. This would be only two and one half (2 '/2'} feet closer to <br />Dale Street than the existing house at 1822 Dale Court (which is at 27 '/z' from the lot line <br />along Dale Street), so this variance request would not be out of character with the <br />existing neighboring structure. <br />The Applicant's original request is not as intrusive toward Dale Court as City <br />Staffs recommendation and spreads the variances slightly in both directions (West to <br />Dale Court and East to Dale Street). Only a pie shaped piece of the proposed garage <br />would extend into the setback (and thus require a variance) and a large portion of the <br />garage would be well within the setback. The requested rear yard setback variance would <br />be along the busy Dale Street and would �7�,j impede views, etc. The only land owner <br />affected by this would be the owner of 1822 North Dale Court, t��e immediate neighbor to <br />the South (the �or�er S�Je��czl�i homestead). As stated above, the rear �_�rc� setback <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.