2006_1009_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Regular Meeting — 09/25/06 DRAFT Minutes - Page 10 Councilmember Ihlan opined that the problems appeared to be with vision concerns at the point of the yard; further opining that she was not supportive of the original subdivision, knowing this would create an unbuildable lot. Public Comment Jim Doherty, Variance Board and Planning Commissioner Mr. Doherty addressed rationale for the Variance Board's denial and previous discussions at the Planning Commission level, as noted by Councilmember Pust, related to the unwillingness of the City to issue any variances. Mr. Doherty reviewed traditional versus modem design homes necessary for the lot; lack of depth for the driveway, creating sight line and safety issues; and visibility along Dale Street and Court respectively. No one else appeared to speak. Councilmember Pust opined that this was a hardship created by the owner; and apologized if some miscommunication occurred between staff or the governing bodies; and sought additional time for a thorough review of the Planning File and related minutes prior to taking action. Mayor Klausing opined that he was not troubledby the request for a variance and saw no impact to the neighborhood and sight lines; however, he expressed concern that the hardship was of the applicant's creation. City Attorney Langel advised that the City Council could table action for 60 days to allow for additional research, as per ordinance provisions, for consideration at their next regular meeting. Councilmember Maschka opined that a home could be designed for the lot without variances being issues; but noted that he was not opposed to holding off on any action until the next regular meeting. Councilmember Kough opined that he didn't see a hardship, since the applicant subdivided the lot.