2006_1009_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

original Dale Street (now Dale Court). Soils in this area should be analyzed for compaction and water content prior to issuance of building pe�nits. The existing property has a garage and a loop driveway that would be removed with the construction of a new home on Parcel " B. 5.2 Parcel "A" could have up to 4650 ;�, C of impervious coverage and still meet the inaxim�m Lct coverage requirements of 3Q%. New parcel "B" could have lot coverage up to 3,482 �.L No house is proposed at this time but a number of alternative designs could adapt to the triangle shaped 1,491 s.f buildable area of the new lot, which meet all the required setbacks. A tuck-under or split level designed house could reduce the foot print by building two to three stories, leaving 1,991 s.£ for driveway and other site improvements — a new driveway on Parcel "A" could range frotn 600 to 1,000 s.f. The newly created parcel may have a£i'ont and rear yard setback o�'�p to 30 feet, a side yard setback of 10 feel. 53 Other lo#s/parcels m the neighborhood have been split m recent years. Specifically, in May 1983 the City approved a lot division at 1748 A1ta Vista, creating the lot at 1747 Dale Street (T'� T425} and in July of 1984 the City approved a lot division at 1766 Alta Vista, creating the lot at 1765 Dale Street (�'F`1 S 13}. PFG3G of 19'� 1 createdthe four lots at 1$00, 1$04 and 180$ Alta Vista and 1781 Dale Street, and PF 1292 of 1981 created the 61ots at 1812, 1816, 1820, 1822 Alta Vista and the 2 vacant lots adjacentto Dale Street. It is worth notingthat none ofthe lot divisions received variances hom width, depth a�ldlor lot area requirements o£the Rosevill� City Code. Pf 3626 (Beauclaire), 1758 Alta Vista, recently (April, 2005) was approved as a minor lot split and a width variance. 5.4 City Code Section 11.0404 E states: Three Parcel Minor Subdivision: When a subdivision creates a total of three (3) or less parcels, situated in an area where public utilities and street rights of way to serve the proposedparcels already exist in accordance with City codes, and no �'urther utility or street extensions are necessary, and the new parcels meet or exceed the size requirements ofthe zoning code, the applicant may apply for a minor subdivision approval. In this case Parcel "A" meets all reauirements of the Ci� Code. An 892 sq. ft lot size variance for Parcel" B is necessary before a decision on the Minor Subdivision can be inade. 5.5 City Code Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) establishes the minimum lot sia�ada�'ds for residential parcels, which includes: an 85 foot minii�uxn width along a public right-of-way; a 110 foot minimum depth; and 11,000 s.f minimum. On a corner lot the width and depth are both 100 feet, the lot area is to be 12,500 s.f. 5.6 In Section 1013 the Code states ..... Where there are practical diffculties or unusual hardships in the way of carrying out the strict fetter of the provisions of this code, the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specifc case and after notice and public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony with RPCA PF3655(0803�5) � Page 3 of 6