2006_1009_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF DRAFT MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF �QS�VILL� AUGUST 3,2005 5. Public Hearings: a. 1'lan�in� File 3655: Request by Todd I1iff,1822 Dale Conrt, for a Variance to Section 1 Qp4.Q16 (Residential Dimensional Requirements —Lot Size) and a Minor Subdivision to create a substandard residential lot. Chair '�ray�or opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschlce provide a verbal summary of the project report dated August 3,2005. Thomas Paschlce advised that Mr. Tliff and family ouni a double frontage parcel he desires to divide into two parcels. The existing lot, Lot 1, Blocic 1, W�leezki Addition, averages 112 feet in depth but is over 327 feet in length. �t is 27,123 s,f in size, approximately 2S times the size of a normal lot in Roseville. The proposal by Mr. Iliffwould create two parcels. Parcel "A" would include the existing home and he a mini�num 93 feet wide (west-front) by a minimum of 112 feet deep (south side) or 15,514 s.f (which is 140% of Code ��quarernents).New Parcel "B" (the triangle) would be generally 226 feet wide along the west front (Dale Court) by 112 to 12 feet deep or 11,608 s.�: (93% of Code requirement for a comer lot). Based on this proposal, Parcel "A" meets the minimum width (85 feet) requirement and the minimum square footage (11,000 €.�. � requirements of Section 1004.016 of the Roseville City Code (see attached land division sheet). Parcel "B" — the triangle - does not meet the lot size for a comer lot which must he 12,500 �;�: --- F's�ree! ,� — F�►�Stfi�� H�ust P�e�t�l R— Pe�� .i7t. I':��, `�l _� yui`rJ i P�sed � �}M.� wr�� J�._,��_ �,,.�� tl�.{er� .. — �irce. . . --� ..�� [] Ce� - y�;�ir��;'�} °�,��s.f `' �:'�s,f �1_��.r. � d�,5o7�.F. �. •�- ,�,.-.,-..r�., • -..�, _._._�� _ �_•.. �_l;.'�, .J�'? .: i l�el �verie� � l;� �e� ^.._ ] � Io a 1 � �t. [ti'rri�■) 10�] fe� The CommunityDevelopmentstaff recommendsapprovalofa 892 s.f, lot size varianceto Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements)for new Parcel "B", and, approval of a minor subdivision to allow the creation of one substandard residential parcel for property located at 1822 Dale Court. The recommendationsare based on thefindings i n Section 5 of the project reportdated August3, 2005 and are based on compliancewith the following conditions: f. The City policy is to require payment of the Metro Area Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) upon the issuance of a building pe�-zx�it. �ri this case, a$1,500 SAC fee is required and will be collected with the issuance of a building permit for RCA pF3655(fl822f15} .. Page 7 of 12