My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1009_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1009_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:27:29 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appeal Letter to the City of Roseville <br />September 15,2006 <br />Page 9 <br />City of RosevilleComprehensivePlan, Section3, Goals and Policies,Paragraph�a Part <br />B (emphasis supplied). <br />The above quoted sections of the Comprehensive Plan indicate an overriding <br />desire in the City of Roseville to allow the type of residential development that the <br />Applicants are ultimately se�icxng here. hi this case, the lot in question is an unusual <br />shape, but is e�remely close in size (appro�mately93%) to the mini�n�xn required for a <br />comer lot. It only makes sense to allow the building of a traditionally designed home <br />on this parcel. <br />A traditionally designed home (as opposed to a unique or "funky" triangular <br />building)will meet the criteria identifiedabove �'raz�x the ComprehensivePlan and will be <br />in the best interest of the City and the neighborhood. <br />For example, as described in the Comprehensive Plan, if a traditionally designed <br />home can be constructed on the parcel, the City's stated goals of striving for better <br />aesthetic appeal will be more easily met. A traditionally designed home will be more <br />likely to be aestheticallypleasing and consistentwith other homes m the neighborhood. <br />Furthermore, allowing the current variance request will allow for the maximum <br />potential of developmentof this parcel but yet remain consistentwith good planning and <br />developmentpractices. Also, the City's expressed desire is to emphasize quality design <br />and aesthetic appeal. <br />There are not too many vacant, buildable residential parcels of this size in the <br />City of Roseville. The ComprehensivePlan states that this little remaining land needs to <br />be "carefully" used. As stated in the ComprehensivePlan, it only makes sense to allow <br />the ma��zz��.u� potential of this parcel, while maintaining good planning and development <br />practices. Denying t�ic request and forcing the construction of an abnormal, <br />unconventional and potentially whacky house on this lot would clearly � further those <br />stated goals. <br />Moreover, the City's residential goals include, protecting single family home <br />areas by keeping incompatible uses (such as Icoo�cy or oftbeat triangular home designs) <br />out of residential neighborhoods. The City also strives to create neiglabarlapad continuity <br />and scale and to improve aesthetic and visual effects. The foregoing will certainly be <br />accomplished if a traditionally designed home structure is placed on this lot. �`l�ese <br />laudable goals will likely not be met if an abnormal or even bizarrely designed triangular <br />home is built on this lot. <br />The allowance of a traditionally designed home will be good for the City and the <br />neighbors as a traditionally designed home will be more consistent with existing <br />strnctures in the neighborhood. Such a plan will thus be less likely to allow an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.