Laserfiche WebLink
Appeal Letterto the City ofRoseville <br />September 1 S, 2006 <br />Page 10 <br />unconventionallydesigned structure that is inconsistentwith the neighborhood cn�l which <br />wouZd not be as aestf�etically pl�asing. It is in the best interests ofthe City to have the Zot <br />improved with a livable, �a���y sin�Ie structure so that another family can call Roseville <br />home. <br />While the strict letter of the City Code may not allow for a traditionally designed <br />home, it is within the power o fthe City CounciZcn�l i�� factspecificaZZyper�itiect by the <br />Code to allow this variance. <br />The CounciZ couZd deny this request to � certain that this parceZ compZies <br />strictly with the City Code. However, to do so is not necessarily consistent with the <br />stated objectives o f the Cotnpreh�nsiv� Plan, the interests o f the City, the interests o f the <br />neighborhoodor with simple P,.�4� sense. The Applicantsmerely desire to sell the lot <br />to a builder or family who will build a relatively modest home having a traditional design <br />(instead o f a very unique ar whacky triangular shape) which would otherwise be <br />consistentwith other homes in the neighborhood. <br />It simpZy �alces sense to aZZow the AppZicants'request. Denyingthe request may <br />be compZiant with the strict Zetter of the Code, b� it reaZZy does not �,�s.e a Zot of <br />common sense n� the larger scheme of what should be important to the City o f Roseville. <br />Thus, for the foregoingreasons the Applicants'request should be approved. <br />Thank you for your time cn�l consideration. <br />Charles Weleczki <br />Suzanne ����cz�c� <br />T�Ilte� <br />encl. <br />