My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1023_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1023_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:54:31 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:40:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
z ■ ■. M <br />2: _ 2' M <br />_ . � { ! S P! R . <br />A.• 7r �• '� 4' GF 6 <br />.ti _ �L�� 4: } L` O . K E! y7C <br />OpeNating levies pNOVide money that can only b�e used foN opeNational expense. <br />providing t�anspo�tation seyvices and funding eo-cur�icular pro�r��n. <br />-: �f ��t�� ������� <br />_� ��� ��� � � ���?-��� �t ��� «t� <br />will experience . . . <br />Class size averages <br />similar to the 2006-07 sizes* (no increases). <br />Elementary schools 28 students <br />Middle school core classes 35 students <br />High school core classes 36 students <br />*!1 veragQr based on J. x. r:� ]}, 2006, prafertronr <br />Curriculum and program <br />�fferi n�s that are competitive with <br />neighboring schools and other <br />top �10 districts. These include . . . <br />Band and orchestra programs in <br />elementary schools. <br />■ Continued access to District pools. <br />• A maintained high school co-curricular <br />program budget. <br />* Career and Technical Education <br />c�p�rtunitt�. ����� �;�;� <br />■ A rrtainrainrci �----- _:-.._.`�4�'�` -' <br />High }'i�rc��tial �� � '...� � � _._� <br />_ ��_ ���.� .. <br />�,ir��r��7 ir� � � .. • , } . ��;. ., .... <br />���.; . . � <br />�G� rr�P ��Ff f*� i -. . yv=�� ' ±:, ��. _ :°�'� :,��s - <br />SC�]ti(iE�. ' ��V-• ' . '•.�;:"•,:_ <br />'.{''. r.,. . <br />� � � ff �.�5��' <br />* <br />* <br />.r . _ t �.i•. <br />�G�ip�l�lrt 1 ���'rLi7 <br />high school social workers and special <br />education teachers. <br />Continued support from deans in the middle <br />and high schools. <br />Continued support from central <br />administrative services. <br />No increases in trans��rtatio� fees. <br />$200 per student, $S00 family cap, <br />for services less than 2 miles. <br />� i����� � � �� <br />The days of levies providing extras are over. By <br />design, the Legislature has made levies increasingly <br />important tools for funding students' basic <br />educational needs. <br />0 <br />��� ��� ����'� <br />No school district can predict future state funding <br />with certainty. And as enrollment declines, so does <br />tl�e total revenue provided by the levy. As such, these <br />improvements can be guaranteed for only one year. <br />Because levies only fund 10% of the District's budget, <br />sustaining �1�e positive effects of the levy is dependent <br />on the success of additional actions, such as those <br />illustrated in the puzzle on page 3: <br />� Legislative support <br />Downsizing <br />■ Providing competitive compensation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.