2006_1113_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Regular Meeting —10123106 DRAFT Minutes - Page 24 Mr. Lloyd briefly reviewed the variance request prompted by the applicant's desire to construct an addition of approximately 15' x 18' in size that would reduce the setbacic from the wetland to approximately 3 5'. Mr. Lloyd advised that the City Engineer, as the City's designated administrator of the Wetland Conservation Act, had determined that a natural wetland was present when the site was originally developed in 1995-1996, and had been enlarged as a result of the use of the wetland since then as a storm water retention pond. Both staff and the Variance Board (31d unanimous vote) had recommended denial of the request, citing no hardship; and under City Code, Section IOI4.04� designates the City Council as the Board of Adjustment in variance appeal actions. Staff determined that the property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls; and that, while the circumstances are unique to properties in this area, the landowner faces no plight if the original developable area on the property is not increased. Various maps, surveys, delineations and site plans were reviewed; as well as additional documents not originally in evidence at the Variance Board hearing and later provided by the applicant at City Council appeal at their October 4, 2006 meeting; and staff noted that the existing structure, with the applicant being the original owner, appeared to have been built up the required 50' setbacic from the "as-built" wetland boundary delineation, in addition to having been built up to all other required setbacic lines. Discussion included a general perspective of the area, the existing and proposed structur�(s); nature of the wetland; various delineations; apparent and documented boundaries; legal versus illegal encroachments into wetland setbacics; and wetland and shoreline definitions. Applicant, Thomas McDaniel, 527 Uwassn Hills Drive Additional discussion ensued of a similar nature between the applicant, staff and the City Council.