My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1120_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1120_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 12:56:42 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:40:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Financing Strategy – Cash Loan <br />As an alternative to issuing housing bonds, the City could choose to simply make a cash loan to <br />Westwood Village. The loan would in effect become an investment. Froin an investment <br />standpoint, a few concerns c�e raised, including: <br />1) All of the City's existing investments c�e federally guaranteed or insured against the <br />loss of principle. A cash loan to a town home association would not car�y this type of <br />protection. However the assessment would become a lien against the property; c�nd <br />would be collected just like ad valoru�n taxes which c�e not subordinate debt. <br />Historically, the City has restricted its investments to no more than a 10 year perzod. In all <br />likelihood, the town home association would be looking fora payback period ofeither 15 or <br />20 years. One of the benefits cn� advantages of the HIA is a longer term than traditional <br />financing. Typical home equity financingis 7 years. Based upon a$1 million total project <br />amount that would be split evenly between all ofthe 47 units, the followingillust�ates bank <br />financingcompared to HIA financing. <br />Financin Bank HIA HIA HIA <br />Term 7 10 15 20 <br />Interest 7.59 6.5 6.5 6.5 <br />Monthl Pa ment $341 $246.64 $188.57 $160.90 <br />Annual P ment $4,094 $2,959.68 $2,262.84 $1,930.80 <br />Annual Savin $1,13432 $1, 831.16 $2,163.20 <br />2) The longer the term ofthe investment, the greater the risk that the City could receive <br />a better return on their investment fromother traditional sources instead ofhaving t�,� <br />fundstied to the HIA loan. Durzng the time this money is loaned-out, the City could <br />potentially miss out on other investment opportunities that might produce even higher <br />rates ofreturn. However with a HIA funding,the payback ofthe loan comes back to <br />the City in three differentways. <br />1. Early pay-off – not all of the owners will want to fuun�e the improvements <br />through this method cn� will pay offthe assessment immediately. It is estimated <br />that approximately 20% of the homeowners will payoff the assessment <br />immediately. In addition, there is not rest�iction for early pay-offc� anytime. <br />2. Evenly Amortized - the HIA funding is structured to be amortized evenly over <br />the life ofthe district. Therefore, both przncipal c�nd interest are being � back <br />evenly each year c�d as the investment becomes seasoned, it becomes more <br />secure. <br />Payoff when a unit is resold - when a home is sold, whatever assessment <br />remains will be paid off. 1 f the average sales turnover in Roseville is 8% then <br />each year 8% ofthe remaining assessment would be fully paid off. <br />— 3) The City's cash reserves, while strong, car�lot sustain repeated loans ofthis size. The <br />— City could make a loan to Westwood Village, but it may come c� the expense of a <br />— futureneed that may prove to be a higher priority. The Council should be cautious in <br />— making financial decisions ofthis magnitude in a vacuum. The Council is advised to <br />— consider whether this investment will address a top priority, or even a top housin <br />= priority. <br />— 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.