Laserfiche WebLink
Other Potential Housing Fund Sources: <br />The City should consider that there are other possible sources of funding that could be reserved <br />for this type of large project renovation lending. The following is a brief summary of those <br />sources: <br />1. Unohligated Tax Increment Revenues from Other Housing Related Projects — There <br />could be some unobligated tax increment revenues from other projects in the City that <br />could be applied to providing loan funds for housing improvements. This option needs to <br />be further evaluated but the city's overall tax increment plan for the entire city clearly <br />identifies using tax increment for housing improvement purposes. <br />2. Individual Loans for only those with lower incomes — This could provide a specific <br />target to only those with lower incomes but would also be a less secure lending method as <br />each loan would be subordinate to the owner's 1 St mortgage. Taxes are generally � a <br />higher position than mortgage and paid first. <br />Financial Need of Owners: <br />The Council may also wish to consider the financial means of the property owners in Westwood <br />Village I. According to Ramsey County Property Records, the average value of these town <br />home units is approximately $211,000. The Citywide median value is $216,000. Providing <br />financial assistance to average-valued homes sets an unusually low eligibility standard. If this <br />were the only benchmark, approximately 5,000 homeowners in Roseville would be eligible for <br />similar assistance. However, many of these owners have lived in their unit for many years and <br />their home value is not a factor of what they can financially afford but rather a factor of the <br />market inflation over a long period of time. <br />A self certification of income was prepared and mailed to all of the unit owners within <br />Westwood Village. As of the date of this report the following is a summary of those results. (See <br />attached sample provided by Ramsey County and used for the survey) <br />33 of the 47 units returned completed surveys or a 70% return rate. <br />Of those 33 units, 61% have incomes at or below 120% of the average median income for the <br />metropolitan area as summarized below. The HRA has set 120% as an affordable workforce <br />housing limit within other programs such as the Family Affordable Loan Program, Housing <br />Redesign Program and Applewood Pointe Project. <br />% af total <br />Income Level affordable units <br />Below 50%�4hi I 5% <br />Between 51%- 60%A�il 10% <br />Between 61%- 80%Ah�l 35% <br />Between 81%- 100%,4�1 30% <br />Between 101%- 120%Ardl 20% <br />According to funding requirements of other public entities for multi-family projects such as <br />(HUD, MHFA, Met Council and Ramsey County), 51% of the units must be deemed <br />affordable to be eligible for public assistance. This project meets and exceeds that definition <br />based upon Rasevilie's affordable housing limits. <br />In addition, 54% of the households are over the age of 55. <br />� <br />