Laserfiche WebLink
Housing Policy Issues: <br />One of the key goals in the Roseville HRA Housing P1an is to: <br />a. "Preserve existing housing and develop new housing in partnership witl� federal, <br />state and regional agencies and non-profitcommunity groups and businesses." <br />Tt�e RHRA Housing P1an and Policies are incorporated and adopted into the City's Comprehe��sive P1an. <br />The RHRA has spent several years studying the houwng conditions and speci�ically the condition and <br />possible deterioration of older multi family housing complexes. As part of the 2003 Mu1ti-family housing <br />study it was concluded that a11 types of Multifamily Housing are important to the community and <br />need to be preserved with a fu11 spectrum of multifamily maintenance programs to increase the <br />value, quality and livability of the multifamily housing stock. The study indicated that the <br />multifamily housing stock is aging and reinvestment is critical. Critical improvements wi11 <br />become necessary such as windows, roof, heating and air handling systems, energy conservation <br />and electrical services and accessibility. <br />The study addressed why is it good public policy to assist in improving multi-family <br />housing stock. There are approximately 9,000 Roseville residents who live in some type of <br />multifamily housing. These residents are an important strand of the community fabric. Helping <br />to ensure that they live in quality, stable housing reduces social problems that impact neighbors <br />and increase the demands on life-safety, school and social services. In addition, it is critical to <br />maintain this aging (and yet affordable) housing stock to ensure that property values keep current <br />with the surrounding communities and inflationary indexes. Once the value of housing begins to <br />decline the impact on the community wi11 increase services, complaints and crime <br />Section 4.7 of the housing plan speci�ically refers to the creation of HIA as a tool to achieve the City's <br />housin� goals: "Evaluate the establishmentof Housing Iinproveinent Districts to address ownershiv <br />mult�-fatnF�� impru��r�r�E; — l�l�c�v��n #��me � t'�Ic�1 �V�n�C rirrt% tl�� 1�kwFZ :_�,_.��:, antC �c�i i����=:in:U nis <br />in K�ev il l� k�iui ►r-��'r hu i li i:� �1tiK ��)7f}'s and �� �����_._ ��;t:; m�+cr 3,�'J[f ti��,ti i ���i xl � i ��:_� �'. i ��rri il4• fitti�� �� i i�:, <br />units, many of which were constructed over 30 k��^r� aga, these are one of the most affordable housing <br />types in the community. The �indings of the Roseville HRA's multi-family study also indicated that those <br />older units include a majority of people over the age of 55. Many of these town homeicondo associations <br />have not set aside adequate home owners association dues to cover the escalating construction costs over <br />the years. Therefore, the funding of large association improvements are either delayed or increases the <br />monthly payment to a 1eve1 that many seniors or lower income individuals can not afford. <br />The MN State Legislature created the HIA legislative authority for the purposes of assisting older <br />complexes to finance major improvements so that there would be less of a�inancial burden on the <br />residents. When these older complexes were constructed, they were not required to collect adequate <br />reserves for future capital improvements. Nor did they anticipate properly the need to collect additional <br />funds for larger project improvements. Newer town home complexes have learned from the past and <br />organizing 1ega1 documents require that a certain percentage of reserves be held in anticipation of large <br />capital improvements. 01der complexes are sti11 hying to catch up. Past of the process for a HIA requires <br />that a�inancial plan be completed by the association so that future fund balances wi11 be available for <br />large capital projects. In the case of Westrvood Village I, they have indicated that the single-board, cedar <br />siding was a big selling point for the original builder and owners were told when a board goes bad they <br />could just pop it off and replace it. Since 1969, previous owners believed that literally and never budgeted <br />for fu11 siding replacement. <br />