My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1218_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1218_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 3:00:42 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:41:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —12/04/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 6 <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that she had been receiving requests <br />from the public to make public comment on the proposed <br />moratorium and their expectations that it would be discussed. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that no one was disputing the error. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned the content of the December 18, <br />2006 agenda, and opined that sufficient time needed to be allotted <br />for the Budget and Levy to receive top priority for discussion. <br />Mr. Miller advised that the December 1$ agenda content and <br />length would be determined on the City Council's action(s) at <br />tonight's meeting (i.e., budget; moratorium; and AUAR); noting <br />that the Twin Lakes proposal was no longer an agenda item; and <br />anticipating a 9:00 — 9:30 p.m. adjournment. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that it was her understanding that <br />there would be time allotted on tonight's agenda to discuss the <br />status of the Twin Lakes Development in light of removal of the <br />applications and termination of the contract, either in closed or <br />open session, and further opined that those items could take <br />significant time, depending on the issues. <br />Mayor Klausing, referring to the communication received from <br />Twin Lakes, LLC, opined that he understood that all applications <br />had been withdrawn; and suggested that it may be more <br />appropriate to have a general discussion at the January Study <br />Session. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned, based on past application <br />documentation and meeting minutes, which actual land use <br />applications had been withdrawn; and requested additional <br />documentation. <br />Mr. Stark responded, at the request of Mayor Klausing, that it was <br />his presumption from past discussions with and correspondence <br />from the developer that all land use applications had been <br />withdrawn. Mr. Stark volunteered to clarify those presumptions <br />with the developer for Council confirmation. Mr. Stark advised <br />that Development Attorney Rod �rass and Financial Advisor Jim <br />Casserly were both planning to be present for a Closed Executive <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.