2006_1218_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION i7epait�nenc Approval: T� {T� DATE: 12/18/06 ITEM N0:7• i_� =4 ��.:,i i��r'��a �c��H I: Agenda Section: Item Description: Request by Ctiirr:� �y� � ��.� ��[.��I�li p a�� ;� �ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT in accordancewith Section 1005.015 and Section 1013.01 of the Roseville City Code for property at 1755 County Road C(PF37G7} CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER27,2006. 1.0 HISTORY: On May 18,2006 Cummings Mobility submitted an application seeking a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. On May 25,2006, the Planning Division de�ernzined the Cummings Mobility application to be incomplete and sent a letter to them indicating the deficiencies —specifically the need for a narrative and accurate site plan. On July 5, 2006, the Planning Division did receive a narrative and site plan, wl�ich information was passed along to the Planning Commission for action on July 12, 2006. Staff did conclude in advance o�`the public hearing that the site plan was not accurate and included a condition (A) in the recommended approval, stating: "The applicant shall complete the application requirerraents prior to any Planning Commission recommendation being for�warded to the City Council. S"peci�cally, the applicant shall submit to the City Planner a narrative of the proposal (current use) for the site including the exact use and desirefor vehicle parking. Further, the applicant shall submit to the City Planner a detailed and scaled site plan indicating existing conditions and the proposal for the sale and display of handicapped equipped vehicles. The proposal shall include customer paNlcir�g and the proposed sale/display vehicle area. On-site parking of vehicles shall meet the �� foot minimum fi°ont yard setback". On July 12,2006, the Roseville Planning Commission voted 4-1 to recommend approval of the requested CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, subject to 4 conditions, one of which was the provision of a accurate site plan to be reviewedlapprovec� by staff prior to City Council approval. The City Planner did receive a revised site plan, however this plan was still not accurate — lacl<ed the specifics of County Road C improvements. In an attempt to save some time and perhaps unnecessary costs, the City Planner sought out the County Road C reconstruction plan sheet applicable to this address from Ramsey County and created a site plan consistent with the request. Upon reviewing all applicable information on the newly created site plan, it was detern�ined that a VARIANCE was necessary — which action needed to occur prior to City Council consideration of the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. P�'37b7_RCA_1218QG Page 1 of 5