My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1218_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1218_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 3:00:42 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:41:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the geothermal technology it would make sense to delay the traditional replacement method <br />for one year and study the geothermal fc�.her and fully understand the risks vs benefits. A1: this <br />time it would mal{e sense to hire an independent consultant to assist in conducting a stringent <br />feasibility study, verify numbers and analyze risks. <br />Basic General Ouestions that Remain <br />1) Shall the City continue to study the geothermal technology? <br />2) Shall the City hire an independent engineer to verify feasibility of the geothermal <br />technology in our replacement situatian? <br />3) Shall the City simply replace in a traditional method? <br />4) Shall the project be delayed until 2008 in order to study f-ur�her wiih an independent <br />engineering firm? <br />5) Due to the age of the system and need for replacement ;� we prepared in the event of <br />a mechanical failure? <br />6) What payback period is acceptable? <br />7) What is an acceptable up froni cost? <br />� Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.