Laserfiche WebLink
desirable. <br />� �,.�r�}F•-.���rt.�p�-.�� �•-�--�"� .��--�-.�--�v�. �ti <br />• These standards are not a quantitative measure of the local availability of <br />funds, lands, personnel, et al, but of operational practices which are <br />desirable to provide adequate park and recreation services and programs <br />for the population to be served. <br />• Standards are NOT maximal goals, but minimal and should be used as a <br />guide to upgrade to the desirable practices. <br />• Standards are not a degree of quality index, that is, cannot be used for <br />comparative purposes of competition among agencies. <br />• Standards are not a cure-all for agency problems, but certainly conducting <br />an agency's operation in accord with standards can prevent many <br />problems and lead to high quality services and program. <br />• Standards can be a dynamic force for change by stimulating park and <br />recreation professionals and the corporate policy body toward better and <br />safer services, programs, and innovations. <br />These Standards should be distinguished from other types of standards which address <br />specific elements, such as open space standards which are population-based and <br />playground equipment standards, which are product-based. These Standards are <br />comprehensive and require much self-assessment and study. They are not a quick- <br />check, self-evaluation instrument. <br />The focus of the Standards is on the operational system overall, rather than on specific <br />elements of services or programs. The Standards are organized into ten major <br />categories: Agency Authority, Role and Responsibility; Planning; Organization and <br />Administration; Human Resources; Finance (Fiscal Policy and Management); Program <br />and Services Management; Facility and Land Use Management; Safety and Security; <br />Risk Management; and Evaluation and Research. Each category is composed of a <br />varying number of Standards. The categories are not weighted as to importance, but all <br />are essential to quality operations. <br />The process for re-accreditation includes: <br />1. Completion of a departmental self-assessment. <br />2. Filing the assessment report with the National Accreditation Office. <br />3. Hosting a site visitation team. (July 22-24, 2004) <br />4. Review and decision by National Accreditation Commission. (October, 2004) <br />At the meeting of October 12, 2004 the National Accreditation Commission granted re- <br />accreditation to Roseville for five years. Jody Yungers, the Assistant Director of Parks <br />and Recreation for Ramsey County, representing one of three agencies in Minnesota <br />that is Accredited (St. Paul being the other) will be on hand to present the plaque to the <br />City Council. <br />POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />The accreditation program is consistentwith the adopted Parks and Recreation Systems <br />Plan which stipulates that the accreditation program is a means to plan and provide for <br />high quality services, programs and facilities and as an appropriate bench mark to evaluate <br />these delivery systems. The program was a part of the approved 2004 budget. <br />