Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 1110/45 <br />ITEM N0:5.c <br />Department Approval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br />�� �� � <br />Item Description: Acceptance of Plaque from National Commission on <br />Accreditation of Parks and Recreation Agencies for Roseville Parks <br />and Recreation Re-Accreditation <br />BACKGROUND <br />In 1994, the City of Roseville Parks and Recreation Department was accredited by the <br />National Commission for Accreditation of Parks and Recreation Agencies. The <br />program requires re-accreditation every five years of which Roseville was in 1999 and <br />now again in 2004. <br />Every recreation and park agency, whatever its focus or its field of operation, is <br />rightFully concerned with the efficiency and effectiveness of its operations. �th the <br />importance of recreation experiences to the quality of life, every agency has an <br />essential responsibility in the lives of individuals. The appraisal of just how well an <br />agency is doing operationally is indeed a difficult task. For this reason, when evaluating <br />an agency, the recreation and park profession and the supporting citizenry have turned <br />to "experience-wisdom"of the profession. When this experience wisdom is formalized, <br />it results in standards against which one evaluates an agency's operation. <br />The Accreditation program consists of 156 standards which were developed for the <br />national program of Accreditation for Local Public Park and Recreation Agencies. <br />Roseville met all 156 standards, 100 %. The standards in the documentwere initially <br />determined by leading professionals in the Great Lakes District of the then National <br />Recreation Association and field tested in a statewide study in Pennsylvania <br />encompassing 30 municipal park and recreation departments employing full-time <br />directors. <br />To be accredited, an Agency must comply with all "fundamental" standards. These are <br />considered fundamental to a quality operation. As for the other standards, 85% of the <br />Standards must be met. <br />A standard is a statement of desirable practice as set forth by experienced and <br />recognized professionals. Standards are an indirect measurement of effectiveness, <br />using the cause and effect approach, or perhaps more appropriately stated "I F... <br />THEN," IF one acts in a certain way, THEN it is expected that there will be a certain <br />result. So, if a desirable standard is practiced, then a good outcome should be <br />forthcoming; if an agency engages in those standards which are recommended, then <br />there should be a quality operation. Standards enable evaluation by comparison; <br />comparing what is within an agency operation with what is accepted by professionals as <br />