My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0110_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0110_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:10:45 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 9:58:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —12/20/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 14 <br />meetings and the evolution of their concept plan. They described <br />the mixture of uses within their proposal. They displayed a map <br />of potential pedestrian connections and images of the various <br />project elements. <br />Joe Samuels, Civil Engineer consultant for Rottlund, described <br />some of the more technical components of the proposed Project. <br />He described the public infrastructure, including street and <br />streetscape plans (possibly including a roundabout), and the <br />drainage and stormwater plans. <br />Councilmember Maschka asked whether we really need a <br />continuous Twin Lakes Parkway. He also questioned proposed <br />stormwater ponding and the ponding connection points to <br />Langton Lake. <br />Mr. Noonan spoke to the traffic projections on Fairview being <br />higher with a discontinuous Twin Lakes Parkway. Mr. Whitten <br />indicated Rottlund was okay with either a continuous or <br />discontinuous Parkway. Public Works Director Duane Schwartz <br />cautioned the Council to consider future Twin Lakes <br />redevelopment phases when evaluating whether Twin Lakes <br />Parkway should be continuous or discontinuous. <br />Councilmember Ihlan asked about the process by which the <br />Twin lakes Parkway moved to its current position. Mr. Whitten <br />described the Stakeholder Panel and Planning Commission input <br />Rottlund had received. <br />Mayor Klausing and Councilmember Maschka asked about <br />moving some housing north and the Parkway south. Rottlund <br />indicated they would consider that. <br />Councilmember Schroeder spoke to the technical aspects of <br />roundabouts and how they work for pedestrians. He encouraged <br />further investigation and use of a roundabout, if possible. <br />Councilmember Schroeder also said he was encouraged by the <br />stormwater plan and suggested sending flow to the existing pond <br />that outlets at Langton Lake and constructing no additional <br />culverts. Regarding a continuous or discontinuous Twin Lakes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.