My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0110_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0110_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:10:45 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 9:58:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Special Meeting — 12/27/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 10 <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, Resolution 1: <br />"BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council shall authorize an <br />independent review of economic development professional <br />services expenditures made from 2001 to the present, to <br />determine whether the expenditures had a legitimate public <br />purpose and were properly authorized by the Council." <br />Councilmember Maschka spoke against the motion and the <br />implication that consulting fees were out of line for a project of <br />this magnitude; noting that the term sheet as part of the <br />development agreement would address the consulting fees as part <br />of the process; and further noting that the motion was not related <br />to tonight's budget actions. <br />Councilmember Schroeder, while noting that there may be merit <br />in future discussions, spoke against the motion at this time. <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in support of the motion, noting <br />his confusion as to what expenditures had been or had not been <br />authorized by the Council; and the danger of being committed to <br />a project to recover costs. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke against the motion, concurring with <br />Councilmember Schroeder's comments that this was not <br />appropriate at this time, and was not a budget item. <br />Councilmember Ihlan defended the motion as a budget item. <br />Councilmember Schroeder opined that a more defined process <br />for review needed to be determined for an independent review. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan and Kough. <br />Nays: Schroeder, Maschka and Klausing. <br />(Motion failed.) <br />Discussion ensued between Councilmember Ihlan and Finance <br />Director Miller regarding impacts on the property tax levy for <br />her proposed Resolution #2: <br />"BE IT RESOLVED that the line item authorizing expenditures <br />for professional services in the economic development budget <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.