My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0110_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0110_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:10:45 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 9:58:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Special Meeting — 12/27/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 11 <br />shall be deleted." Councilmember Ihlan noted she would not <br />pursue this proposed resolution. <br />Community Development Director Welsch noted that the <br />professional services represented demographic and data base <br />items and ongoing activities of the department. <br />Councilmember Ihlan provided a bench handout for her next <br />proposed motion. <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, adoption of a resolution as <br />follows: <br />"BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council shall not authorize <br />payment of any professional consultant expenditures against <br />future tax increment revenue on development proj ects not finally <br />approved by the council." <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in opposition to the motion, primarily <br />based on the procedure used by Councilmember Ihlan in <br />presenting the motion, without benefit of public comment and <br />feedback, or without opportunity for the staff to review and <br />report on implications and the rationale for existing policy. <br />Mayor Klausing reminded the Council of tonight's priority in <br />setting the 2005 Budget and Levy. <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in support of the motion to restrict <br />future tax increment financing (TIF) and increasing debt. <br />Councilmember Schroeder spoke against the motion, based on <br />the need for more information and to further explore the impacts. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan and Kough. <br />Nays: Schroeder, Maschka and Klausing. <br />(Motion failed.) <br />Schroeder moved, Ihlan seconded, adoption of a resolution as <br />follows: <br />"BE IT RESOLVED that professional consulting service <br />expenditures in excess of $500 must be approved and authorized <br />by the City Council before services are provided." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.