My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0124_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0124_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 2:07:28 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 9:59:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: O 1 /24/OS <br />ITEM: 3. <br />Department Approval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br />s � � ..� ��� ���'� �'�� <br />Item Description: Transportation Summit <br />Background: We want to take this opportunityto have a discussion with the Council regarding <br />a number of changes in proposed county and Mn/DOT projects that impact Roseville, as well as <br />issues that are affecting all of us in transportation planning. We will hear from Mn/DOT, <br />Ramsey County, and our staff as to the status of proposed projects, project selection criteria and <br />process, and current funding issues, plus a bit about proposals before the legislature. <br />We would also like to talk with the Council about the need for a broader approach to long-range <br />transportation planning for the City of Roseville. This need has been evident recently in light of <br />several major land use proposals before the Council in recent months. Major land use changes <br />can have impacts beyond the immediate adjacent roadway system, and we need to be prepared to <br />predict what these impacts will be in order to sufficiently plan for future improvements to the <br />transportation system. Seeking and planning for funding for major improvements is a process <br />that in many cases needs to begin years in advance of a proposed construction date. <br />An outline of what we have asked each agency to discuss with you is as follows: <br />Mn/DOT — Frank Pafko, North Area Manager <br />a. Projects planned for o w area including recent changes to scheduled projects <br />b. Bus rapid transit <br />c. Fast lane proposals <br />d. Selection criteria and process for Mn/DOT improvements <br />e. Funding issues and challenges <br />2. Ramsey County— Ken Haider, Ramsey CountyPublic Works Director; Dan Soler, <br />Ramsey County Traffic Engineer <br />a. Construction and maintenance proj ects programmed in Roseville, as well as <br />funding impacts to Ramsey County's current Transportation Improvement <br />Program <br />b. Selection criteria r' process for Ramsey County's T.I.P. <br />c. Funding issues related to County transportation needs <br />d. Potential future submittals for Federal grant projects in Roseville <br />- Cost participation implications to the City for Federal projects <br />3. City of Roseville— Duane Schwartz, Public Works Director; Deb Bloom, City Engineer <br />a. Proj ects programmed in C.I.P. <br />b. SelectioncriteriaandprocessforRosevilleprojects <br />c. Funding issues related to Cityprojects <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.