Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Christopher K. Miller <br />March 16,2005 <br />Page 3 <br />another officer or employee unless and except if certain conditions as set forth in the statute are <br />complied with. Those provisions seem to set forth the following rules: <br />— �A� Under no circumstances may an employee who is directly involved <br />— in the auction or process pertaining to the administration and <br />� collection of bids purchase such property. We read this broadly and <br />preclude any employees who may be involved in the sale process <br />' from purchasing property. <br />�B� In order for any employee to be eligible to purchase such property <br />there must have been reasonable public notice that was given of the <br />sale or auction. The statute specifically states that requirements for <br />reasonable public notice may be prescribed by other law or <br />ordinance, so long as at least one week's published notice is <br />specified. In this regard, published notice means just that. In other <br />words, at least a week before items are put on the auction block at an <br />electronic auction house, there should be notice published pursuant <br />to Minn. Stat. � 331A.03. I would also point out, that it looks to us <br />that there are potentials for alternative dissemination of such <br />published notice, that, if sought to be used and if the proper <br />procedures were followed, could do away with the requirement for <br />newspaper publication after a period of six months. If that is <br />something of interest of the city, let us know and we can give you <br />further information on our interpretation of the statute in that regard. <br />�C� Because of the use of the phrase "employee and officer" in the <br />statute, and places where they are used together and then where only <br />one is used, Minn. Stat. � 15.054 seems to state that under no <br />circumstances may an officer of the subdivision purchase property <br />from the subdivision. <br />As is often the case in these kinds of statutes, there is no definition <br />of the word "officer." Frequently in other statutory provisions, <br />phrases such as "public officials" and other similar listings of <br />"categories" of persons are set forth, usually with no definition. <br />Therefore, we need to be conservative in our approach to ensure that <br />no one violates the law. Any person violating a provision of Minn. <br />Stat. � 15.054 is guilty of a misdemeanor, so we want to avoid that. <br />Under any reading of what an officer would be, certainly the elected <br />officials of the city would be its officers. This is supported by a <br />