Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Christopher K. Miller <br />March 16, 2005 <br />Page 4 <br />reading of Minn. Stat. �� 412.02 and 412.021. Council members and <br />the mayor would qualify as officers. There is a reference in 412.023, <br />subd. 2(a) to a city administrator, as an "other officer" see �'Ii�n, <br />Stat. � 412.023, subd. 5. Thus, the City Administrator should be <br />considered an officer. <br />_ In addition, when one looks under the statutes dealing with optional <br />! plan B cities, Minn. Stat. ;� 412.681 is entitled in part "officers are ! <br />— under the manager." It indicates that there is to be a clerk, a � <br />— treasurer and "such other officers subordinate to the manager as the - <br />— council may create by ordinance." From this, one can argue that a <br />person is only deemed an "officer" if an ordinance of the City states <br />they are one. Or, one could take the viewpoint that persons <br />subordinate to the manager but high up in the hierarchy might be, by <br />analogy, "officers" of a city. <br />We think the last statement above to be the most conservative �� <br />_ approach one could take. And we believe that to be the best <br />t <br />_ approach to take. It certainly insures that the City does not violate ` <br />— any law. Under such approach, all department heads would be <br />considered to be officers. That would make them ineligible for the <br />purchase of surplus property. <br />��� The prohibitions on sales to employees never applies to items that <br />the city sales to the general public in the ordinary course of business. <br />So, for instance, if the city owns a candy manufacturing plant and - <br />sells candy to anyone at all, any employee can also buy it. If the city <br />sells water, employees and officers can also buy it. <br />Finally, we need to point out that the prohibition in 15.054 is against officers or <br />employees of the City selling to prohibited individuals, or in circumstances where the proper <br />procedures as set forth above are not followed. As noted earlier, any person violating the <br />provisions of that statute would be guilty of a misdemeanor. Because of that, we believe that it <br />is important that the identity of the purchaser be known to the City at or before the completion <br />of the sale. Therefore, only those on-line auction services in which the identity of the <br />purchaser is known should be used by the City. <br />