My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0509_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0509_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:10:10 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:01:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 04/25/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 20 <br />President of Rottlund Homes, identifying specific parcels, <br />ownership and negotiation status; as well as status of existing <br />tenants and potential relocation costs. <br />Page 4. Tax Increment Revenue BondslNotes <br />Discussion included determination of a Reconciliation Date, and <br />interest rate calculations and projections. <br />Pa�e 5, Calculation of Redeveloper Mar ig n and <br />Limitation of Assistance <br />Ms. Reiter identified Proforma calculations for resources and <br />uses; level of profit with consideration of all potential revenues <br />to the project, with a fixed cap and date for that calculation, to be <br />further detailed in the redevelopment agreement; commercial <br />property appraisal comparisons; and determination of all future <br />income of developer and determination of retail valuations of <br />property. <br />It was Council consensus that this be addressed specifically, with <br />further definition in the redevelopment agreement to ensure <br />disclosure and identification by the developer to capture <br />additional income sources. <br />Mr. Casserley advised that this was in process now, and that the <br />analysis will be attached to the redevelopment agreement, with a <br />series of explanations to track it, the City's level of investment <br />and rates of return, to be agreed upon by both parties to the <br />agreement. <br />Further discussion included the margin shares listed in the term <br />sheet, average rates of return on an industry-wide basis, and data <br />available from publicly-held companies in determining the rates. <br />Bob Strachota, President of Shenehon Companies, the <br />developer's appraisal firm, reviewed 2003 data, as the most <br />current available, from 21 competitors in determining the <br />margins as listed. <br />Mr. Casserly clarified that the margin is a not-to-exceed limit, <br />represented construction, not land sales, and only applicable to <br />eligible expenses of available TIF over a 25 year TIF' District. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.