My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0509_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0509_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:10:10 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:01:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting— 04/25/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 21 <br />Pa�e 7, Site and Minimum Improvements <br />Discussion included definition of eligible costs as set by state <br />statute. <br />Page 8, Phasing <br />On paragraph 3 regarding linkage, Mayor Klausing requested the <br />addition of commercial "property" when discussion certificates <br />of occupancy issuance. <br />Discussion included the phasing of specific areas of the proposed <br />redevelopment; the Council's concern with the developer's <br />acquisition of parcels in Area 8 as critical to achieve an <br />economically feasible project; <br />Councilmember Maschka clarified the critical nature of Area 8 in <br />the economic feasibility of the entire project, and the City's right <br />to terminate the project if that property acquisition was not <br />achieved, to be clearly defined in the redevelopment agreement. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding linkage of housing to <br />commercial construction and the ratio; and phasing of the <br />residential portion of the project in comparison to the retail <br />portion. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed his concern related to Area 8 and <br />assurances that within 2-5 years, both the residential and <br />commercial portions of the project will be accomplished. <br />Councilmember Maschka noted the absorption rate with housing; <br />historical demographics to-date; and the need to get a draft <br />redevelopment agreement in place to determine feasibility issues. <br />Page 9, Quality of Minimum Improvements; <br />and Grants. Responsible Parties <br />Ms. Reiter reviewed formulations; developer concerns with a <br />multi-year contract; and market values. <br />Pa�e 10, Park Dedication FeelPublic Onen Snace Contributions <br />Discussion included clarification of language to specify land <br />dedication or fee options associatedwith the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.