My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0620_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0620_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:57:55 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:02:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oval Task Force Final Report <br />The Task Force purposely did not address the short term fmancial need for the chiller repair. <br />o It was deemed out of scope as the Task Force did not want to exhaust its time in <br />addressing this short term need, and not have time to truly understand the long term <br />need and the financial options to address it <br />Business Model Findings (Details in Business Model Section) <br />o Conservative Projection outlined has identified approaches totaling $60,000 to <br />address the $100,000 operational cost shortfall <br />o Of the remaining $40,000 -- $10,000 is for the "Aggressive Skate Park"; $30,000 is <br />for community use, and would be considered a city contribution to the "Public Good" <br />o Optimistic Projection outlined has identified approaches totaling $176,500 —which <br />well-exceeds the $100,000 operational cost shortfall <br />o There are several, realistic approaches to achieve the annual capitalization cost target <br />of $� 50,000, though it requires leadership, vigilance and diligence of the City <br />Council and city staff <br />o There are $45,000 in "soft dollars" that facility usage provides for public benefit <br />o There are 100,000 "recreation occasions" at the RSC Oval, and thus the city <br />contribution per recreation occasion: $1 <br />o Events at the Oval provide subsequent and significant economic impact to Roseville <br />merchants <br />o Mothballing the Oval will only reduce the operating deficit of the RSC by an <br />estimated $2S-$SQK per year due to the elimination of costs related to the Oval. <br />There would still be at least an estimated $50-$7SK shortfall (assuming no reductions <br />in revenues at the remaining facilities due to a loss of critical mass of recreation <br />activities) <br />o Demolition of the Oval would incur a one-time cost of $250,000 (possibly more if <br />hazardous waste disposal is required) <br />G. Task Fo�ce Recommendations <br />�-�.: Pursue chiller repairs and other repairs as described in reports developed by the <br />Technical Task Force <br />� It is a unique facility and a valued asset ($3 million) <br />* There are compelling approaches for addressing operating and expected <br />capitaIizationldepreciation costs <br />R-2: For Addressing the annual $100,000 Operating Costs Shortfall <br />* Pursue operating efficiencies learned from the season of natural ice — Target: $SK <br />� Raise User Fees — Target Increase: $25K <br />• Raise Public Skating Fees $1 to a fee of $5 — Target Increase: $12.�K <br />• Increase number of participants through low cost user group and RVA marketing efforts, <br />theme nights (e.g. "New Brig�ton Night"), sponsor nights (e.g.: "93-X at the Oval") etc. <br />• Pursue special, annual opening event —Target: Net $SK <br />• Pursue expected, improvements to Oval Banquet facility operations — Target: Net $3.5K <br />• Friends of the Oval contribution — Target: $SK <br />• Consider the summer "Aggressive Skate Park" a city contribution of $ l OK <br />• Obtain Roseville Visitors Association funding for Roseville Glows utilities: $SK <br />Oval Task Force Fina1 Report Page 3 of29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.