My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0711_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0711_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:23:22 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:03:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Cauncil Reguiar Meeting — 06/20/05 <br />DRAFT Minuies - Page 23 <br />outlining a model lighting ordinance he recommended tha� <br />the City consider adapting. <br />Carol Erickson, 2925 Mildred Drive <br />Ms. Erickson read a quatation from a recent newspaper <br />article related to the continuing success oi mixed use <br />develapments (retail/residential) and national mark�t <br />trends; and encauraged the City Council to vote fc�r this <br />develop�nent. <br />Mayor KIausing closed the Public Hearing at 9:22 p.m, <br />Mayor Klausing requested that City staff and consultants <br />address those coneerns and comments raised during the <br />Public Hearing; listing those items as he had them <br />summarized. <br />Discussion and clarification included limitatians on <br />enviranmental clean up costs; additional environmental <br />testing in process io quantify risk; burden on develapear to <br />accomplish the envi�-onmental remediation process for all <br />parcels in the redevelopment project; patential use of <br />Eminent Damain as a last resort, and in consideration of <br />pending . legislation and �itigation, with provisions <br />adequately addressed in the proposed Redev�Iopment <br />Agreement; City Attorney Scott Ander�on reiterating City <br />Attorn�y opinion �hat no Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />was requircd; and pending litigatian of Friends of Twin <br />Lakes vs. the City af Rosevill� and potential summary <br />judgment decisions within 90 days. <br />Councilmemb�r Kough wished to go on recard that he is af <br />the opinion, along with Councilmember Ihlan, that <br />aznendment of �he Comprehensive Plan requires a 4/5 vo�e <br />of the City Council. <br />Further discussion and clarification included limited <br />expenses in the area for infrastructure demand and <br />developer responsibility versus city responsibili�ies (i.e., <br />landscaping, right-o�'-way maintenance, lighting}; <br />continuing collec�ion of $430,000 in existing taxes; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.