My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0711_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0711_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:23:22 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:03:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Cauncii Regular Meeting — 06/20/05 <br />DRAFT M�nutes - Page 36 <br />Nays: Kough and Ihlan. <br />j12.5] Consider a Proposed Qrdinance Rezoning <br />Certain ParceIs within Twin Lakes Phase I fram "B-1" <br />Limited Business District, "B-4" ReEail Offiee Se�-vice <br />District, "I-�" Light Industrial District, and "�-2" <br />General Industrial District to Pianned Unit <br />Development with underlying znning of "B-6," Mixed <br />Us� Business Park." <br />Schroeder moved, Maschka �econded, �nactmen� of <br />Ordinance Na. 1323 �ntitl�d, "An Ordinance Amending <br />Title 10 of the City Code, Changing the Zoning Map <br />Designation a� C�rtain Real Property within Twin Lakes <br />Phase I from B-1, B-4, and I-1 and I-2 to Planned Unif <br />Deve�opment {PUD) No. 1323 with an Underlying Zoning <br />of B-6 Mixed Use Business Park District and Park and <br />Open Space District (POS)." <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motian, opining it <br />was incansisient wiih BT6 Zoning District provisions. <br />Discussian included staff � intez-pretation of limited use <br />def nitions and permissible uses. <br />Councilmember Kough concurred with Councilmember <br />Ihlan and spoke against the motion, opining it was a darastic <br />change in the Camprehensive Plan, and that the deveioper <br />should have to come back �or Council approval to change <br />from office to renial housing. <br />Councilmember Schroeder opined that staff had done a <br />good j ab in preparing documcnts, research, and <br />consultatian with legal counsel, and were providing their <br />recommendations. Councilmember Schroeder thanked <br />fihem for th�ir work and prafessional opinions provided; <br />and spoke zn support of the motion. <br />Roll Call [12.5 — Rezoning Ordinance] <br />Ayes: Schroeder; Maschka and Klausing. <br />Nays: Kough and Ihlan. <br />Ordinance 1323 <br />Rezaning Certain <br />Parcels within <br />Twin Lakes Phase I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.