My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0711_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0711_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:23:22 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:03:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Cauncil Regnlaar Meeting — 06/20/05 <br />DRAFT Mi�u�fes - Page 37 <br />[12.6] Consider a Proposed Planned Unit D�velopment <br />(PUD} Agreement fo�r Twin Lakes Phase I <br />Schroeder moved, Maschka seconded, approval of the Final <br />Planned Unit Development Agreement between the City of <br />Roseville and Rottlund (Roseville Twin Lak�s, LLC}; <br />subject to approval of a Tax Increment Financing District <br />and a Haza�dous Substances Sub District; and suhject to <br />approvaC of all terms and conditions within the Twin <br />Lakes Phase I Cont�act for Private Redevelopment <br />Agreement." <br />Discussion included green space af the PUD; City Attorney <br />Squires' opinion arelated to the compie�ion of the <br />Environmental Review pracess ar�d pending Iitigation; and <br />impervious surface issues. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed concerns rclated to the <br />mitigaiion plan and DNR camments re�ated to the AUAR; <br />and apined that more green space was required. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the PUD Agreement. <br />Joe Samuel, Engineer w�th ROK <br />Mr. Samuel addressed the green space calculations of the <br />development; clarifying that th.e bl% open space <br />calculation excluded the city pond. <br />Rc�l� Ca11 [12.6 — Final PUD Agreement] <br />Ayes: Schraeder; Maschka and Klausing, <br />Nays: Kough and Ihlan. <br />6.d [5.1] Consider Filing an Application for 20�5 Livable <br />Communities Demonstratian Funds for Twin Lakes <br />Phase I <br />Economic Development Specialzst Cathy Bennett outlined <br />the request, similar to those made in the past, to submit an <br />applicatian to the Metropolitan Council for a Livable <br />Coinmunities Demonstration Account Pragram gran� to <br />provide gap �unding for the public infrastructure costs af <br />Twin Lakes Parkway and Prior Avenue roadways, <br />sidewalks and right-of-way improvements associated with <br />th� Twin Lakes Redevelopmen� Project, Phase I. Ms. <br />Proposed Pianned <br />Unit Development <br />(PUD) Agreement <br />for Twin Lakes <br />Phase I <br />Resolution 1Q319 <br />2005 Livable <br />Communities <br />Demonstratian <br />Funds for 'i�vin <br />Lakes Phase I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.