My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0711_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0711_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:23:22 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:03:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VOTLRS AGAINST "1 HE TWIN LAKES PROJEC`�" <br />SOME COMMENTS <br />• Why do�sn't tlle city council heip subsidize our pro�erty taxes? <br />• The city and citizens oCRoseville will pay for not benefit fra�n ihis—o��iy the <br />deveiopers will. <br />• It is 1Lidicrous and fiscally irrespor�sible for a city council to agree to pay a�or <br />profit compaity ta devc;lop private property. The whole process has beei� a fiasco <br />fron� the start resirictiilg propasals from only onecompany. 'l,,his is not the <br />cleinocratic process. <br />• We do1�'t need any more bi�; retail de�eiopme��t. Build some single; fazzlily l�oines <br />anc� make more pai•t space. <br />+ Taxpayer fundc:d subsidies for bi�; busiiiess at tl�e expense of Roseville resideaais <br />is WRONGi Please send this natice to every Roseville resident. <br />� No bi� box. Too much lraffic & retail naw. Tranquility lost for natl�ing but <br />trash. <br />• Put ihis proposal o�� tile bailot and let RosevilIe residents V4TE oi� it. It wo��'t <br />pass bcca�.xse as it stands it STINKS. <br />• property taxes aa•e higl� enough. Roseville D4ES NOT NEED any nlore retail. <br />• Do th� 3 nienibers of the eouncil in favor of big box care at all about haw the <br />majority �f Rosev�lle residen�s feel? If so, they'd Ilave a�•elerendun� vote aj�d <br />list�i� to tl�ose �l�at elec��d them rather tha�i corporatc developers that live outside <br />Roseville. ' <br />• I'm willing ta give tl�is smaiI danatian to 1�elp figl�t tl�e mis��se of my taxes �or �he <br />misappropriaiio�� of private paroperty. <br />• Listen to tl�e citizens of Roseville. The nlajarity oithen� are a�;ainst this <br />deveiopment. Rev�rse your decisian and vote this down. <br />• I need my mon�y for �nedical and living ea�penses not to pay taxes :for rich <br />development. We a11 pay our own way, <br />• We don't need anytnare retail in Rosevi�ie. <br />• Hazlg in there, Amy Ihlaza. We support yau. <br />• Our taxes are too higll as it is withaut addin� to tl�e burden. Let t��e devcloper use <br />his own n�oney instead of ours. We s�ouid recall the peopie who war�t to push it <br />through without voter approval. <br />• Property by en�ine��t domain is not right <br />• A�ai�ist big box, toa dense in housing, too mucll tra#'fie, use TIF dalla�•s ta <br />pollL�tion clean Lip thc�� o.ffer popery ta oiher developers, i�at R.otflui�d. <br />• We do not need a big box or more retail. <br />• No �ilore comnlercial in RoseviIl�. We already have 4X ihe average houselzold. <br />• This is �lot representative �overnment. � sirnply can't understa��d wliy so�Ile <br />council �nembers support lhis pian and choose ta ignore the citizens. It's b�con�e <br />and u��fortunaie sl�or�v of stubbornness. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.