2005_0711_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• We would like to see kosevill� allow oth�r developers to offer alternative proposal—prajects tl�at are consiste�it with the ciiy's Master Piaa�. �ave tl�e wildlafe areas—the ti•ees, the wetlands, the la►�ds and tl�e wildlife. Not a fillex•ing plan for Raseville. � City Council sl�ould spend mare tin�e listei�ing to the residealt's wisi7es o�� all matters. � This definitely not good plan for the people of Roseville. We stroilgiy oppose it. � I do ��o� �hinl: we need any more shopping places. I do not wai�t iny taxes to be iz�creased %r tl�is. • Its unfo��unate the people who vote our elected oFficial ia1 a re becoa��ing ihe voices ynu don't listen tc� anymore. Developers ai•e all about $$, T'he enviro��ane�ii is pollt�ied Uecause pf them. We don't ileed tnore retailll The Cauncil isn't listening to ai�yane but tl�c one developer. • 1'his ��rinle piece ofproperl:y should not be a gift to the land barons. M�tst be a be#ter plan. Mi�st be a better plan developici� revc��ue far t��: CrTY. • Rosevillc is givin�; away wiih this developrnent too znuch. � Toa niany housi�lg units. Nat tax ine. financing. The tax we get now is b�tier than none, sin�;Ie family honlcs would be nice. • Tax dollars should not be spent on developme��t. + I cat�zot believe the decisions this council is nzaking. T��ere slaould be a city wide voTr. � DEan Masc}aka was ar�lazed at the size of the ne�v Target store fron� Iliway 36. I wonder how he'll react to the development at Twin Lakes. Thesc people don't have a clue. • Business shouicl pay for it's own developmeni and taxes like hor�eow�lers do. • What was the City pian�iing to do with the tax mo�ley? • Losin� two acres of parklaild is also appalling! ! • I wonder wllat kind o� a kickback Craig, Dean, and Greg are getting? • Deal should not be exclusive �ior should it be subsidized: P�'imarily disapprove the process. • Tell Mr. Masc�ka, Mr. Kla�rsing and Mr. Schroeder tllat there is no sz�ch t��ing as "free money" • Do not think we shoult[ ha�e to pay far businesses to c�evelop tlit-o�tgl� TI� fu�ids. Have more than a��e tirm offer pla�s for area. • I would like to I�el.p halt tl�is carporate welFare. • We ara opposed to public subsidy for developn�eiit, usc of e�ni��ent do�nain t� siz� privaie property, a�ld are conc�r�led the develapme.nt will har�� La��;ton Lake and exacerbate the TCL; problem. + Disapprove of tax burden ai�d taking private prope�-ty by law. •(1) Raseville is I'RIME location for dev�loper—they do not ��eed tax bread {25 years) to be profitabl�;. (2) How can big box retail �t i�� w/ residential. Wi�o wnuld chaase to Iive there? • We would Iike a Coslco closer to Roseville, but not in ai� already congested area. • Rnsevil[e doesn't need this development and should look for more creative �.�s of this land. Rottland's use makes us look like every other �ne. 2