2005_0711_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• Don't want city to pick only one contractor. City Cou��cil sho�ild �iot have last say so. • There a�•e better ways to spend out tax dollars. T��e cily is �iving too n�uch to oi�e private developer. • We tl�ink this is a horrible misuse of taxpayer n�onc;y and trust. • We do not believi i�� subsidizing private develop�neiat when tl�ere are othcr avenues for tl�em. In my opi��ion we do noti need any more sl�oppi��g centeres in Roseville. + Who is the develop�r? All support? 25 years? NO. • We do not nced any �nore shoppin� centers!! � Using tax rncreine��t financing for this developme��t is i�•t'espo��sible: As i� the concepi of tiie wliole project. � Roseville used to ]zave a re�utation as a qttality plac� to Iive. Do we wa��t to become th�; best pIac� ta shop instead? • We already pay too rnany tax�s. We awn a small b�siness. No one in gover�unent is giving trs a tax brcak . • No i��ore rctail. 1'eople in debt tao much, • We do not approv� c�i'tl�is no taxes far 25 years a�l tl�is d�velop�nent pla�a. • 1 am agai��st emii�ent domai�� practices and we sl�auld not be supporti�lg contractors with ot�r tax ��o��ey. If they cazl't c�o it an fiheir aw��-GE`1' RID O� THEM. • Affordable housing would be a better chaice. Listen to your Rosevill� citireus. • We simpl� caiznot afi-ord a venture of this type. We don't ��eed anothe�• big bax stare. How abotzt IZaving I�oseville residenis vote an this? Our ofliciais do��'t seem to bc tisteniz�g to us. + No to retail. Rosevilfe ��eeds upscaie housin�. • Why don't tliose 3 ding a lin�s on the council listen �o the average nori��al cilizens. I don't �et il. � Don't need mor� senior housing. • Traffic increase is too ��uch. We do no! need more retail. • We are concerned and disappointed over this costly �eniure. There was ��ever a need case built for the project. 'l,his will pravc to be a shortsighied mave witl� Iong ran�e ��e�ative irnpacts on our neighborhaod. + The bulk ol�the city co�ncil are not Iisle��ing io tl�e public. Thank yo�i for all your doing to help t�e public to be heard. • Too rnuch retail a�ad iraf�c. � We have toa much retail—should not subsidize retaiI developmei�t –Costco • Too 1na�1y einpty areas in maii now. Do�1't �ieed more. • We do �ZOt need at�other shoppiz�g center. • There are already enot�gh retail options in Roseville {tin�es 2}. • We have enough �ig bax stor�s. If the land and location valL�es are so great, ll�e developer should pay �or it rathez- than Roseville Citizens. NO Tl��. � We do not need a�ly more shopping in tl�is area. Tl�e traffc is terribie i�1 this area. 3