2005_0718_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• License rental properties. • Address traffic management issues citywide, but especially on Josephine Road and at the intersections � Snelling and Hamline, Maple Lane and Fairview, and Wooc�hill and Lexington. Improve traffic planning for higher-density housing developments. • Connect County Road C2 between Lexington and Hamline Avenues. • Post and enforce Park hours. • Remove billboard at Lexington and Josephine Road. • Engage Northwestern College in a dialogue about the effect af their rental properties on the social composition af the Roseville community. • Extend mass transit to Roseville to reduce trafiic. • Set city priority to support single-familyhomes, not high-density homes. • Actually listen to the city's citizens—no lip service. • Purchase land between Lexington and Josephine Road to preserve as open space. ■ Change the name af Oval to Skating Center. What can citizen do to respond to these issues? (Source:Suggestions lefton "Sticky Notes.") • Use "Block Captains" to be constantly monitoring and reporting code violations. What action ideas were participants willing to support? (Source: Feedbacksheets*) Nineteen (19)persons indicated that they could personally support one or more of the issues solution ideas/projecfs discussed. The ideas/pzojects included: • Open County Road C2 (7 persons) • Curb expansion af Northwestern College rental housing (2persons) • Disseminate information about Code and enforce (2 persons) • Repair and promote the Oval (2 persons) . Having greater community involvement (1 person) • Keeping up a dialogue between those who need and where the resources are found (1 person) • Control af trafiic (1 person) Remove billboard at Josephine and Lexington (lperson) Were participants satisfied with the meeting? (Source: Feedback sheets*) • Twenty-four (24) respondents agreed that they had an opportunity to voice their thoughts during small group discussions. Ten (10)respondents did not answer the question. • Twenty-three (23)res�orldents thought that the dialogue was informative. Two (2) respondents thought it was only somewhat informative, and nine (9) respondents did not answer the question. • Nineteen (19) respondents indicated interest in similar dialogues on other citywide topics. No one topic was mentioned more than once. Topics mentioned included: o General discussion adequate o Commercial and retail development o Nuisances—noise, animals, speeders o Updating Roseville o Cleaning up Roseville enforcing codes o Community Center North Ce��a1,�CKa 33ialogue Summary P. � Mey 3,2005