My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0718_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0718_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:29:57 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:03:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
---�R1� �'Ttw <br />parking, pets, the number af persons or families living in one residence, boat storage, operations <br />of small businesses out of homes, and who to call about different types af complaints. <br />Participants also asked basic questions about enforcement policies and procedures, such as: <br />• Do staff conduct general inspections or do they only respond to complaints? <br />• How many enforcement staffinembers are there and is that number enough to meet City <br />needs? <br />Are there programs in place to help residents comply with City Code when they lack <br />sufficient resources to do so? <br />Several issues around communications between the City and residents surfaced in the meetings. <br />There was general a� eement that: <br />• New property owners (single-familyrental and homestead and multi-family) are not <br />adequately informed about Code requirements and regulations. <br />• Citizens are not adequately informed about upearr�ing changes (group homes to new <br />development) in their neighborhood, particularly if you are not within thc current <br />required notiiication threshold. <br />• Citizens do not ici�pw who to contact in City Hall about particular problems. <br />■ Citizens who make complaints do know how issues were resolved. <br />• Multi-family property managers (apartment complexes in particular) do not feel <br />adequately informed about incidents that happen in their building and therefore are <br />hampered in actions they can take to evict problems tenants and enhance the general <br />security of the building. <br />In some cases, participants were siznpl� seeking more "one-way" communication stxeazxts that <br />would provide information and keep residents better informed about what is happening in <br />their neighborhood. In other cases, participants were seeking "interactive" communication that <br />would involve education, citizen engagement, and City and property-owner accountability to <br />the public. <br />Wh at were the �en.eral observations participant made about their �zei�hborhoods and <br />tlze comnzunit�? <br />Participants approached discussions about their neighborhoods and Roseville from a holistic <br />perspective. For many, there was no distinction between housing and the other City systems <br />that interact to make a neighborhood functional and to support their quality-of-life. Noz�t- <br />housing issues have been grouped to fit within the City af Roseville's organizational structure. <br />All issues were included even though some inay not be within the city's jurisdiction. <br />ZZpseville RHR?� Cazxzmuziify Dialogue on Housing ---DRE�FT--- <br />Prepared by the Center far Policy, Plailning, and Perfarmance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.