Laserfiche WebLink
o City could license residential rental properties <br />o City could lunit number of licenses issued <br />o Permitting residential properties is aIsa an option <br />Suggestions far Community Action <br />■ Long-term residents could be ambassadars to new residents <br />Group 3 <br />Suggestions for City Action <br />. Provide a direct line to a City staff person who can help (Itwas suggested that city staff <br />should rotate through the position to prevent burn-out and to give everyone a sense � <br />the issues and what can be done to address them.) <br />o There could be a medi.a�or for neighbor conflicts <br />o Creating a one-stop shop would create a vehicle far accountability and reduce <br />"passing the bu�k" to someone else in the city <br />• Put teeth into existing codes <br />o Adequately fund positions so there is someone to enfarce regulations <br />Gr�oi.ip 4 <br />Suggestions for City Action <br />• City could create a policy that would trigger a public input process far businesses <br />proposals that reach certam thresholds of size and activity (input wou�d be on <br />architectural design, operations, etc.) <br />. Block captains could be better ufilized to communicate information to the community <br />. IZosevilie Wrap could be improved—increase frequency and number of substantive <br />articles <br />• Create a mandatory "Saturday School" for rental property owners—cover topics such <br />as regulatory requirements, neighbar expectations, etc. <br />. In�orin people about ardinances so they knativ what the regulations are and can report <br />violations <br />Suggestions far Cor��nuz�zty Action <br />. Develop a Community Ed course far first-time home owners <br />Citizens could be mare proactive in reparting violations to the city <br />Citizens could be mare proactive in providing input into development project, e.�, the <br />Cub Store development is a good example. The developer and the City involved <br />citizens at several points in the process. As a result of their input, the Cub Store <br />projectis a good development from both the neighborhood's and the developer's <br />perspectives. <br />Roseville Review could be improved—increase frequency and number of substantive <br />articles <br />Raw Notes FXOnt 5nia11 Groups and Flip C1�art p. 3 <br />South East Area Dialogue (4/2b/2005) <br />